April 06, 2008

Long, but not too long legs are attractive

Evolution and Human Behavior
Volume 29, Issue 2, March 2008, Pages 86-91

Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner

Piotr Sorokowskia, and Boguslaw Pawlowski

Abstract

It has been shown that height is one of the morphological traits that influence a person's attractiveness.next term To date, few studies have addressed the relationship between different components of height and physical previous termattractiveness.next term Here, we study how leg length influences previous termattractivenessnext term in men and women. Stimuli consisted of seven different pictures of a man and seven pictures of a woman in which the ratio between leg length and height was varied from the average phenotype by elongating and shortening the legs. One hundred men and 118 women were asked to assess the previous termattractivenessnext term of the silhouettes using a seven-point scale. We found that male and female pictures with shorter than average legs were perceived as less attractive by both sexes. Although longer legs appeared to be more attractive, this was true only for the slight (5%) leg length increase; excessively long legs decreased body previous termattractivenessnext term for both sexes. Because leg length conveys biological quality, we hypothesize that such preferences reflect the workings of evolved mate-selection mechanisms. Short and/or excessively long legs might indicate maladaptive biological conditions such as genetic diseases, health problems, or weak immune responses to adverse environmental factors acting during childhood and adolescence.

Link

2 comments:

Dragon Horse said...

I'm curious how this plays out into different ethnic groups.

My standing height is 188cm (6'3.5)

My legs (based on pants leg length in inches) is 88.9 cm (35 inch)

So my legs are about 47% of my height.


I'm African American.

My wife, a Japanese national...

Legs: 72cm

Height: 162.5 cm (5'4")

So 44% of her height.

I can visibly look at her legs and tell by Western standards (using a white Anglo-Saxon average) that they are "short" compared to her torso...but in Japan I believe her ratio is average.

Blacks in America (predominately West African) tend to have longer legs (on average) than white Americans (who are predominately Celtic and Germanic).

Dragon Horse said...

So I guess my question is...what % of leg length to height is considered "optimal" and does this figure vary by ethnicity?