mtDNA from Chalcolithic Iberia (El Mirador cave)

A very exciting new study from Chalcolithic Iberia. The authors compare their mtDNA data with those from the Brandt et al. (2013) paper which includes German samples from the same time.

The following plot seems quite useful. From its caption:

This study: El Mirador (MIR). Published prehistoric cultures [21]: Hunter-gatherer central (HGC), Linear Pottery culture (LBK), Rössen culture (RSC), Schöningen group (SCG), Baalberge culture (BAC), Salzmünde culture (SMC), Bernburg culture (BEC), Corded Ware culture (CWC), Bell Beaker culture (BBC), Unetice culture (UC), Funnel Beaker culture (FBC), Pitted Ware culture (PWC), Hunter-Gatherer south (HGS), (Epi) Cardial (CAR), Neolithic Portugal (NPO), Neolithic Basque Country and Navarre (NBQ), Treilles culture (TRE), Hunter-gatherer east (HGE), Bronze Age Siberia (BAS), Bronze Age Kazakhstan (BAK).

From the paper:

In none of the analyses El Mirador sample shows close genetic affinities with a contemporaneous Bell Beaker population of 29 specimens gathered from three sites in Germany. The Bell Beaker mtDNA signal is characterized by high frequencies (around 50%) of H haplogroup that in El Mirador only reaches 26%. This heterogeneity in the genetic composition of geographically close populations adds further complexity to future reconstructions of these ancient expansions and correlates with the existence of contemporaneous groups with and without the typical Bell Beaker burial kit.

mtDNA may not be the best tool for studying the spread of Bell Beakers (if this involved men), but this shows that the high frequency of H in Bell Beakers of Germany (observed by Brandt et al.) is not due to an even higher frequency of H in Iberia.

PLoS ONE 9(8): e105105. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105105

Mitochondrial DNA from El Mirador Cave (Atapuerca, Spain) Reveals the Heterogeneity of Chalcolithic Populations

Daniel Gómez-Sánchez,Iñigo Olalde et al.

Previous mitochondrial DNA analyses on ancient European remains have suggested that the current distribution of haplogroup H was modeled by the expansion of the Bell Beaker culture (ca 4,500–4,050 years BP) out of Iberia during the Chalcolithic period. However, little is known on the genetic composition of contemporaneous Iberian populations that do not carry the archaeological tool kit defining this culture. Here we have retrieved mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences from 19 individuals from a Chalcolithic sample from El Mirador cave in Spain, dated to 4,760–4,200 years BP and we have analyzed the haplogroup composition in the context of modern and ancient populations. Regarding extant African, Asian and European populations, El Mirador shows affinities with Near Eastern groups. In different analyses with other ancient samples, El Mirador clusters with Middle and Late Neolithic populations from Germany, belonging to the Rössen, the Salzmünde and the Baalberge archaeological cultures but not with contemporaneous Bell Beakers. Our analyses support the existence of a common genetic signal between Western and Central Europe during the Middle and Late Neolithic and points to a heterogeneous genetic landscape among Chalcolithic groups.

Link

Early Neandertal disappearance in Iberia

Journal of Human Evolution DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.002

New evidence of early Neanderthal disappearance in the Iberian Peninsula

Bertila Galván et al.

The timing of the end of the Middle Palaeolithic and the disappearance of Neanderthals continue to be strongly debated. Current chronometric evidence from different European sites pushes the end of the Middle Palaeolithic throughout the continent back to around 42 thousand years ago (ka). This has called into question some of the dates from the Iberian Peninsula, previously considered as one of the last refuge zones of the Neanderthals. Evidence of Neanderthal occupation in Iberia after 42 ka is now very scarce and open to debate on chronological and technological grounds. Here we report thermoluminescence (TL) and optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dates from El Salt, a Middle Palaeolithic site in Alicante, Spain, the archaeological sequence of which shows a transition from recurrent to sporadic human occupation culminating in the abandonment of the site. The new dates place this sequence within MIS 3, between ca. 60 and 45 ka. An abrupt sedimentary change towards the top of the sequence suggests a strong aridification episode coinciding with the last Neanderthal occupation of the site. These results are in agreement with current chronometric data from other sites in the Iberian Peninsula and point towards possible breakdown and disappearance of the Neanderthal local population around the time of the Heinrich 5 event. Iberian sites with recent dates (less than 40 ka) attributed to the Middle Palaeolithic should be revised in the light of these data.

Link

Sima de los Huesos hominins: ~430 thousand years old and on the Neandertal lineage

Science 20 June 2014: Vol. 344 no. 6190 pp. 1358-1363 DOI: 10.1126/science.1253958

Neandertal roots: Cranial and chronological evidence from Sima de los Huesos

J. L. Arsuaga et al.

Seventeen Middle Pleistocene crania from the Sima de los Huesos site (Atapuerca, Spain) are analyzed, including seven new specimens. This sample makes it possible to thoroughly characterize a Middle Pleistocene hominin paleodeme and to address hypotheses about the origin and evolution of the Neandertals. Using a variety of techniques, the hominin-bearing layer could be reassigned to a period around 430,000 years ago. The sample shows a consistent morphological pattern with derived Neandertal features present in the face and anterior vault, many of which are related to the masticatory apparatus. This suggests that facial modification was the first step in the evolution of the Neandertal lineage, pointing to a mosaic pattern of evolution, with different anatomical and functional modules evolving at different rates.

Link

Chronology of the earliest Upper Paleolithic in northern Iberia (Wood et al. 2014)

From a press release:

The main conclusion -"the scene of the meeting between a Neanderthal and a Cro-magnon does not seem to have taken place on the Iberian Peninsula"- is the same as the one that has been gradually reached over the last three years by different research groups when studying key settlements in Great Britain, Italy, Germany and France. "For 25 years we had been saying that Neanderthals and early humans lived together for 8,000-10,000 years. Today, we think that in Europe there was a gap between one species and the other and, therefore, there was no hybridation, which did in fact take place in areas of the Middle East," explained Arrizabalaga. The UPV/EHU professor is also the co-author of a piece of research published in 2012 that puts back the datings of the Neanderthals. "We did the dating again in accordance with the ultrafiltration treatment that eliminates rejuvenating contamination, remains of the Mousterian, the material culture belonging to the Neanderthals from sites in the south of the Peninsula. Very recent dates had been obtained in them -up to 29,000 years- but the new datings go back to 44,000 years older than the first dates that can be attributed to the Cro-Magnons," explained the UPV/EHU professor.

Journal of Human Evolution Volume 69, April 2014, Pages 91–109

The chronology of the earliest Upper Palaeolithic in northern Iberia: New insights from L'Arbreda, Labeko Koba and La Viña

R.E. Wood et al.

Since the late 1980s, northern Iberia has yielded some of the earliest radiocarbon dated Aurignacian assemblages in Western Europe, probably produced by anatomically modern humans (AMHs). This is at odds with its location furthest from the likely eastern entry point of AMHs, and has also suggested to some that the Châtelperronian resulted from cultural transfer from AMHs to Neanderthals. However, the accuracy of the early chronology has been extensively disputed, primarily because of the poor association between the dated samples and human activity. Here, we test the chronology of three sites in northern Iberia, L'Arbreda, Labeko Koba and La Viña, by radiocarbon dating ultrafiltered collagen from anthropogenically modified bones. The published dates from Labeko Koba are shown to be significant underestimates due to the insufficient removal of young contaminants. The early (c.44 ka cal BP [thousands of calibrated years before present]) Aurignacian chronology at L'Arbreda cannot be reproduced, but the reason for this is difficult to ascertain. The existing chronology of La Viña is found to be approximately correct. Together, the evidence suggests that major changes in technocomplexes occurred contemporaneously between the Mediterranean and Atlantic regions of northern Iberia, with the Aurignacian appearing around 42 ka cal BP, a date broadly consistent with the appearance of this industry elsewhere in Western Europe.

Link

Brown-skinned, blue-eyed, Y-haplogroup C-bearing European hunter-gatherer from Spain (Olalde et al. 2014)

There is nothing like a little ancient DNA weirdness to start off 2014, which promises to be as exciting as 2013 was.

The new study La Brana 1 identifies it as ancestral in the SLC24A5 locus in which virtually all Europeans are derived. This comes in the heels of the Loschbour preprint which identified that sample from Luxembourg as also being ancestral. Taken together, it's now clear that hunter-gatherers from Mesolithic Western Europe were brown.

Curiously, it now seems that both Europe and India were (in part) inhabited by brown people and became lighter by a process of admixture + selection. The process went "all the way" in Europe, but a cline of pigmentation was sustained in India.

The other finding (not mentioned in the abstract) is that La Brana 1 belonged to Y-haplogroup C6! This is a low-frequency European clade of haplogroup C. So now, we have evidence that haplogroup C is not eastern Eurasian (as the presence of its subclades in Australia, India, East Asia, and the Americas might suggest), but a pan-Eurasian entity. It remains to be seen whether this C-in-Europe can be pushed further back in time, but finding it in Mesolithic Iberia reduces the chance that it's some random eastern Eurasian who made it to the outskirts of Europe recently.

Finally, La Brana 1 has derived alleles at loci associated with pathogen resistance. This might be important, because a common hypothesis is that Europeans developed this type of resistance during the Neolithic as they started interacting with the pathogens of domesticated species and started living in less-hygienic higher-density settlements.


Nature (2014) doi:10.1038/nature12960

Derived immune and ancestral pigmentation alleles in a 7,000-year-old Mesolithic European

Iñigo Olalde et al.

Ancient genomic sequences have started to reveal the origin and the demographic impact of farmers from the Neolithic period spreading into Europe1, 2, 3. The adoption of farming, stock breeding and sedentary societies during the Neolithic may have resulted in adaptive changes in genes associated with immunity and diet4. However, the limited data available from earlier hunter-gatherers preclude an understanding of the selective processes associated with this crucial transition to agriculture in recent human evolution. Here we sequence an approximately 7,000-year-old Mesolithic skeleton discovered at the La Braña-Arintero site in León, Spain, to retrieve a complete pre-agricultural European human genome. Analysis of this genome in the context of other ancient samples suggests the existence of a common ancient genomic signature across western and central Eurasia from the Upper Paleolithic to the Mesolithic. The La Braña individual carries ancestral alleles in several skin pigmentation genes, suggesting that the light skin of modern Europeans was not yet ubiquitous in Mesolithic times. Moreover, we provide evidence that a significant number of derived, putatively adaptive variants associated with pathogen resistance in modern Europeans were already present in this hunter-gatherer.

Link

Lactase persistence and natural selection (Sverrisdóttir et al. 2014)

The big question is: did the present-day high allele frequency in Europeans happen because of natural selection or because of admixture with a population that was already lactase persistent?

For example, the lactase persistence allele occurs at a non-trivial frequency in present-day inhabitants of the Americas, whereas it was zero there a few thousand years ago, with the culprit being post-1492 European colonization. The frequency change in the Americas didn't happen because of natural selection, but because a new population (Europeans) moved in.

If admixture with a lactase persistent population L is at play, then the question remains how L became lactase persistent in the first place. However, this transforms the problem from (a) seeking something in the European cultural or natural environment acting as an agent of selection, into (b) seeking something in the cultural/natural environment of population L. I don't know what L might be, but seeking a population with lots of cows is a good place to start...

Mol Biol Evol (2014) doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu049

Direct estimates of natural selection in Iberia indicate calcium absorption was not the only driver of lactase persistence in Europe

Oddný Ósk Sverrisdóttir et al.

Lactase persistence (LP) is a genetically determined trait whereby the enzyme lactase is expressed throughout adult life. Lactase is necessary for the digestion of lactose – the main carbohydrate in milk – and its production is down-regulated after the weaning period in most humans and all other mammals studied. Several sources of evidence indicate that LP has evolved independently, in different parts of the world over the last 10,000 years, and has been subject to strong natural selection in dairying populations. In Europeans LP is strongly associated with, and probably caused by, a single C to T mutation 13,910bp upstream of the lactase (LCT) gene (-13,910*T). Despite a considerable body of research, the reasons why LP should provide such a strong selective advantage remains poorly understood. In this study we examine one of the most widely cited hypotheses for selection on LP – that fresh milk consumption supplements the poor vitamin D and calcium status of northern Europe's early farmers (the calcium assimilation hypothesis). We do this by testing for natural selection on -13,910*T using ancient DNA data from the skeletal remains of eight late Neolithic Iberian individuals, whom we would not expect to have poor vitamin D and calcium status because of relatively high incident UVB-light levels. None of the 8 samples successfully typed in the study had the derived T-allele. In addition, we reanalyse published data from French Neolithic remains to both test for population continuity and further examine the evolution of LP in the region. Using simulations that accommodate genetic drift, natural selection, uncertainty in calibrated radiocarbon dates, and sampling error, we find that natural selection is still required to explain the observed increase in allele frequency. We conclude that the calcium assimilation hypothesis is insufficient to explain the spread of lactase persistence in Europe.

Link

400 thousand year old human mtDNA from Sima de los Huesos

It will come to no surprise to people who noticed an earlier paper on cave bear mtDNA from Atapuerca that the folks at the Max Planck Institute would try to do the same for the plentiful human remains found in the Pit of Bones.

A new paper in Nature reports their success, and overnight increases by an order of magnitude the time depth for which we now have human mtDNA from what is commonly designated as Homo heidelbergensis, from right in the middle of the Middle Pleistocene. Obviously, this opens new vistas for archaeogenetic research, making it possible to directly look at early pre-sapiens forms of humans, and not only on their final forms prior to their replacement, the Neandertals and Denisovans.

The most impressive aspect of the new paper is most likely the technical challenges that the researchers must've overcome to achieve this result. The cave bear DNA showed that this was possible, but human DNA adds an additional complication in the form of contamination by a closely related species, us.

But, the new evolutionary result which will interest those of us not interested in the minutiae of biomolecules will no doubt be the fact that the Sima hominin's mtDNA formed a clade with the much more recent Denisova girl.

Until now, we knew that Neandertal mtDNA grouped together and so did modern human mtDNA. The two groups shared a Middle Pleistocene common ancestor and a much more distant common ancestor (~1 million years) with the mtDNA found in Denisova. The new Sima specimen shares descent from Denisova. This is important because it shows that whatever archaic human population the Denisovan mtDNA belonged to also extended to western Europe. And, surprisingly, the Sima specimen did not group with Neandertals, as might be expected because of the incipient Neanderthaloid morphology of the Sima hominins which has been a matter of controversy as it pushes back the evolutionary lineage of H. neandertalensis deeper into the Middle Pleistocene that some researchers accept.

Before this paper, it was believed that H. heidelbergensis evolved somewhere (perhaps Near East or Africa), a subset of it evolved to H. sapiens in Africa, and a different subset evolved in Eurasia, leading up to H. neandertalensis in the west, and unknown forms in the east, of which the Denisova girl was a matrilineal descendant. The next question is: when did Neandertals and Neandertal mtDNA appear in Europe? 

It can now be hoped that such questions will be answered directly. The Sima individual studied in this paper is not some frozen specimen from the Arctic, preserved by a freak accident in pristine form for hundreds of thousands of years, but a person who lived in Southwestern Europe. I am fairly sure that this won't be the last really old human we see a paper about in the coming years. Human mtDNA used to present a simple picture at the time of the discovery of African mitochondrial Eve: the deepest splits were in Africa and Eurasians belonged to a subset of African variation. But, as more and more archaic Eurasian mtDNA is sampled, it now appears that modern human mtDNA is a subset of world human mtDNA whose deepest splits are in Eurasia, and the next deepest splits are in Africa. Obviously, this may be a consequence of the fact that archaic human mtDNA has only been sampled from Eurasia, for factors relating to DNA preservation. But, it is nonetheless interesting to wonder where on the tree the mtDNA of archaic Africans would fall.

Nature (2013) doi:10.1038/nature12788

A mitochondrial genome sequence of a hominin from Sima de los Huesos

Matthias Meyer et al.

Excavations of a complex of caves in the Sierra de Atapuerca in northern Spain have unearthed hominin fossils that range in age from the early Pleistocene to the Holocene1. One of these sites, the ‘Sima de los Huesos’ (‘pit of bones’), has yielded the world’s largest assemblage of Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils2, 3, consisting of at least 28 individuals4 dated to over 300,000 years ago5. The skeletal remains share a number of morphological features with fossils classified as Homo heidelbergensis and also display distinct Neanderthal-derived traits6, 7, 8. Here we determine an almost complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a hominin from Sima de los Huesos and show that it is closely related to the lineage leading to mitochondrial genomes of Denisovans9, 10, an eastern Eurasian sister group to Neanderthals. Our results pave the way for DNA research on hominins from the Middle Pleistocene.

Link

Iberian Neolithic farmer DNA

A currently not available preprint that has important implications about the Neolithic of Europe.

A late Neolithic Iberian farmer exhibits genetic affinity to Neolithic Scandinavian farmers and a Bronze Age central European farmer

Sverrisdóttir, Oddný Ósk et al.

The spread of farming, the neolithisation process, swept over Europe after the advent of the farming lifestyle in the near east approximately 11,000 years ago. However the mode of transmission and its impact on the demographic patterns of Europe remains largely unknown. In this study we obtained : 66,476,944 bp of genomic DNA from the remains of a 4000 year old Neolithic farmer from the site of El Portalón, 15 km east of Burgos, Spain. We compared the genomic signature of this individual to modern-day populations as well as the few Neolithic individuals that has produced large-scale autosomal data. The Neolithic Portalón individual is genetically most similar to southern Europeans, similar to a Scandinavian Neolithic farmer and the Tyrolean Iceman. In contrast, the Neolithic Portalón individual displays little affinity to two Mesolithic samples from the near-by area, La Brana, demonstrating a distinct change in population history between 7,000 and 4,000 years ago for the northern Iberian Peninsula.

Link

IBD sharing between Iberians and North Africans (Botigué et al. 2013)

An interesting new paper documents an excess of IBD sharing between Iberians (excluding Basques) and North African (and particular NW African) populations.

It would have been nice if the authors had used techniques such as rolloff and ALDER or those of Jin et al. (2012) to say something about the time/nature of the admixture event detected via IBD sharing; insteady, they use variance in admixture proportions, which gives a probably much noisier estimate, with the basic idea being that in the first few generations post-admixture there are individuals with much varying admixture proportions, but these tend to be homogenized over time.

The occurrence of North African-specific admixture in SW Europe has long been suspected on the basis of Y-chromosome/mtDNA work (e.g., the presence of E-M81 which is probably the best North African marker in existence). It also makes sense, because of the limited occurrence of Sub-Saharan markers in Iberia: such elements did not, presumably, fly over North Africa, but landed in Iberia via people who were themselves admixed.

A couple notes of caution:

(i) the use of ADMIXTURE as a means of estimating admixture proportions is dangerous in this case, because of the hybridity of "North Africans" themselves, which according to published estimates experienced Sub-Saharan African admixture in the last few thousand years. In my own experiments it is clear that "North Africans" are a mixture of three basic components related to Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Near East. Nonetheless, in my own experiments I do also get an excess of the component I've labeled "Northwest African" in Iberia that is not shared by Basques or French.

(ii) as I've emphasized before, IBD sharing between populations does not indicate the direction of gene flow. One would have to look at the ancestry of the shared segments to determine their origin. To give a simple example, an IBD segment shared by a Spaniard and a Mexican could be European, African, or Native American, and -thanks to historical knowledge- we can be fairly sure that the number of such segments is also in the given order.

Given that Iberia is the neighbor of NW Africa one would not be surprised if there was gene flow in both directions, and while North Africa gene flow into Iberia is one possible explanation, some of the gene flow may have gone the other way, e.g., with contacts during the Pax Romana, fleeing Iberian Muslim in the post-reconquista period, Barbary pirates attacking Christian ships and the like. In any case, it would be interesting to catalogue IBD shared segments between Iberia and NW Africa in terms of their geographical origin.

(iii) the sources and timing of admixture could potentially be determined by ancient DNA work. The three most recent time periods are related to the slave trade (both European of Africans and vice versa), the Islamic period, and the Roman Empire. Presumably, with the sampling of enough individuals, that type of admixture ought to manifest in populations living before/after each of these three events.

In any case, this is an interesting paper which is also accompanied by publicly accessible data.

PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306223110

Gene flow from North Africa contributes to differential human genetic diversity in southern Europe

Laura R. Botigué et al.

Human genetic diversity in southern Europe is higher than in other regions of the continent. This difference has been attributed to postglacial expansions, the demic diffusion of agriculture from the Near East, and gene flow from Africa. Using SNP data from 2,099 individuals in 43 populations, we show that estimates of recent shared ancestry between Europe and Africa are substantially increased when gene flow from North Africans, rather than Sub-Saharan Africans, is considered. The gradient of North African ancestry accounts for previous observations of low levels of sharing with Sub-Saharan Africa and is independent of recent gene flow from the Near East. The source of genetic diversity in southern Europe has important biomedical implications; we find that most disease risk alleles from genome-wide association studies follow expected patterns of divergence between Europe and North Africa, with the principal exception of multiple sclerosis.

Link

The Geography of Recent Genetic Ancestry across Europe (Ralph and Coop 2013)

This paper first came out last July on the arXiv and went through four versions there before its final form which has now appeared in PLoS Biology. It's great that its early release allowed other people to read it without having to wait for the completion of the peer review process.

I think that this is a good model: journals have the right and obligation to subject papers to close scrutiny according to their own procedures, but this process ought not interfere with the early availability of research results or the ability of anyone other than the chosen reviewers to comment on new results.

PLoS Biol 11(5): e1001555. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001555

The Geography of Recent Genetic Ancestry across Europe

Peter Ralph, Graham Coop

The recent genealogical history of human populations is a complex mosaic formed by individual migration, large-scale population movements, and other demographic events. Population genomics datasets can provide a window into this recent history, as rare traces of recent shared genetic ancestry are detectable due to long segments of shared genomic material. We make use of genomic data for 2,257 Europeans (in the Population Reference Sample [POPRES] dataset) to conduct one of the first surveys of recent genealogical ancestry over the past 3,000 years at a continental scale. We detected 1.9 million shared long genomic segments, and used the lengths of these to infer the distribution of shared ancestors across time and geography. We find that a pair of modern Europeans living in neighboring populations share around 2–12 genetic common ancestors from the last 1,500 years, and upwards of 100 genetic ancestors from the previous 1,000 years. These numbers drop off exponentially with geographic distance, but since these genetic ancestors are a tiny fraction of common genealogical ancestors, individuals from opposite ends of Europe are still expected to share millions of common genealogical ancestors over the last 1,000 years. There is also substantial regional variation in the number of shared genetic ancestors. For example, there are especially high numbers of common ancestors shared between many eastern populations that date roughly to the migration period (which includes the Slavic and Hunnic expansions into that region). Some of the lowest levels of common ancestry are seen in the Italian and Iberian peninsulas, which may indicate different effects of historical population expansions in these areas and/or more stably structured populations. Population genomic datasets have considerable power to uncover recent demographic history, and will allow a much fuller picture of the close genealogical kinship of individuals across the world.

Link

Direct dating of El Sidrón Neandertals: 48.4+/-3.2ky BP

I sometimes wonder what will be left of the "long co-existence between AMH and Neandertals in Europe" once all the radiocarbon redating dust settles. The more interesting question is: how did AMH wipe out the Neandertals? Love or War? If recent history of encounters between populations with a clear technology differential is any guide, probably a little bit of both.

Archaeometry Volume 55, Issue 1, pages 148–158, February 2013

A NEW DATE FOR THE NEANDERTHALS FROM EL SIDRÓN CAVE (ASTURIAS, NORTHERN SPAIN)*

R. E. WOOD et al.

Torres et al. (2010) published a series of radiocarbon, AAR, ESR and OSL dates from the site of El Sidrón, northern Spain, which is notable for the discovery of the partial remains of 12 Neanderthals. Whilst the non-radiocarbon methods suggested an age beyond 32 600–46 300 years, direct radiocarbon dates on the human fossils were inconsistent, ranging between 10 000 and 50 000 bp. This study uses the ultrafiltration pre-treatment protocol to obtain a date of 48 400 ± 3200 bp (OxA-21 776) on a bone fragment and confirm the antiquity of the Neanderthal assemblage. Moreover, it demonstrates the comparability of the ultrafiltration and ninhydrin bone radiocarbon pre-treatment protocols, and highlights the need for appropriate screening methods where valuable collections with poor biomolecular preservation are sampled for collagen extraction.

Link

Our rabbit-hunting ancestors (Fa et al. 2013)

From the paper:

Relative to other mammal groups, rabbit bone abundance was always significantly higher during the Upper Palaeolithic (76%) and Mesolithic (59%) than during the Middle Palaeolithic (Fig. 4). The difference between the average rabbit remains and that of cervids, the second most abundant prey item, were less than 10% during the Mousterian. In contrast, during the Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic, the difference between the rabbit and the second-most important prey items was over 60% and 20%, respectively. After the rabbit, large ungulates (caprids, cervids and equids) were relatively important during the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic, while caprids, cervids and suids took that place during the Mesolithic (Fig. 4).

and:

Our evidence indicates that hominin diets may have changed from one dependent on large mammals during the Middle Palaeolithic to diets dominated by smaller species in the Upper Palaeolithic, in particular by the wild rabbit. The explanation for this transition is either that climate change negatively impacted large mammal populations, forcing prehistoric people to incorporate smaller vertebrate species into their diets, or that people themselves negatively impacted large mammal populations, which in turn forced foragers to add smaller species to their diets. 

I am not sure how modern hunter-gatherers hunt rabbits, but I would think that trapping, or some type of slingshot or blowdart would be ideal for this small and fast-moving animal. Did Neandertals simply lack efficient technology to capture rabbit, or is there some other reason why they underutilized the species?

Journal of Human Evolution DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.002

Rabbits and hominin survival in Iberia 

John E. Fa et al.

High dependence on the hunting and consumption of large mammals by some hominins may have limited their survival once their preferred quarry became scarce or disappeared. Adaptation to smaller residual prey would have been essential after the many large-bodied species decreased in numbers. We focus on the use of a superabundant species, the rabbit, to demonstrate the importance of this taxon in Iberia as fundamental to predators. We show that the use of the rabbit over time has increased, and that there could have been differential consumption by Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans (AMH). Analysis of bone remains from excavations throughout Iberia show that this lagomorph was a crucial part of the diet of AMH but was relatively unutilised during the Mousterian, when Neanderthals were present. We first present changes in mammalian biomass and mean body mass of mammals over 50,000 years, to illustrate the dramatic loss of large mammalian fauna and to show how the rabbit may have contributed a consistently high proportion of the available game biomass throughout that period. Unlike the Italian Peninsula and other parts of Europe, in Iberia the rabbit has provided a food resource of great importance for predators including hominins. We suggest that hunters that could shift focus to rabbits and other smaller residual fauna, once larger-bodied species decreased in numbers, would have been able to persist. From the evidence presented here, we postulate that Neanderthals may have been less capable of prey-shifting and hence use the high-biomass prey resource provided by the rabbit, to the extent AMH did.

Link

Late Neandertal survival in Iberia questioned

Neanderthal remains point to earlier extinction

In the latest study1, Higham and his former graduate student Rachel Wood, now at the Australian National University in Canberra, tried to date remains from 11 sites on the Iberian Peninsula using their decontamination methods. Previous efforts put the remains as young as 36,000 years old.

However, Wood and Higham found that just two of the sites — Jarama, outside Madrid, and Cueva del Boquete de Zafarraya, near the southern tip of Spain — contained bones with enough carbon to be dated. Their work suggests that these remains are more than 45,000 years old, with some older than 50,000 years, the practical limit of carbon dating. Wood says that the team’s study calls into question evidence that the last populations of Neanderthals found refuge in the Iberian Peninsula.

PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207656110

Radiocarbon dating casts doubt on the late chronology of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in southern Iberia

Rachel E. Wood et al.

It is commonly accepted that some of the latest dates for Neanderthal fossils and Mousterian industries are found south of the Ebro valley in Iberia at ca. 36 ka calBP (calibrated radiocarbon date ranges). In contrast, to the north of the valley the Mousterian disappears shortly before the Proto-Aurignacian appears at ca. 42 ka calBP. The latter is most likely produced by anatomically modern humans. However, two-thirds of dates from the south are radiocarbon dates, a technique that is particularly sensitive to carbon contaminants of a younger age that can be difficult to remove using routine pretreatment protocols. We have attempted to test the reliability of chronologies of 11 southern Iberian Middle and early Upper Paleolithic sites. Only two, Jarama VI and Zafarraya, were found to contain material that could be reliably dated. In both sites, Middle Paleolithic contexts were previously dated by radiocarbon to less than 42 ka calBP. Using ultrafiltration to purify faunal bone collagen before radiocarbon dating, we obtain ages at least 10 ka 14C years older, close to or beyond the limit of the radiocarbon method for the Mousterian at Jarama VI and Neanderthal fossils at Zafarraya. Unless rigorous pretreatment protocols have been used, radiocarbon dates should be assumed to be inaccurate until proven otherwise in this region. Evidence for the late survival of Neanderthals in southern Iberia is limited to one possible site, Cueva Antón, and alternative models of human occupation of the region should be considered.

Link

Ancient mtDNA from Santimamiñe Cave

I see press releases and news stories on this cave from time to time, but I haven't actually located any published studies. If anyone is aware of more information, feel free to leave a comment.

Genetic research reveals that current population of Urdaibai probably descended from cave dwellers at Santimamiñe

The comparison of DNA extracted from a Homo sapiens who inhabited the Santimamine Cave (in the Basque province of Biscay) some 4,000 years ago, and from 6 other bone remains found in the same cave, with the DNA of 158 persons currently living in the surrounding Urdaibai region, has shown that current individuals have maternal lineages very similar to the archaeological remains. The findings enable putting forward the hypothesis that the current population is descended from the ancient denizens of the Santimamine Cave. 

... 

The research received funding from the Department of Culture of the Provincial Government of Bizkaia, as well as from the Urdaibai District Authority. Once the research in Urdabai is concluded, it is hoped that, shortly, it will be extended to other regions of the Basque Country, using new studies of funerary sites from the same period and from other eras (the Copper Age, the Bronze Age, etc.) thus enabling extending the knowledge we currently have on the special characteristics of the Basque population. This populational group has sparked enormous scientific interest for its distinctive characteristics regarding the preservation of its pre-Indo-European language and its relative isolation from the influence of other peoples and cultures.

Assessment of ancient European DNA with 'globe13'

Here is my assessment of ancient DNA from Europe using the globe13 calculator:

You can consult the spreadsheet for the distribution of these components in modern populations. As in previous analyses, the main distinction is between Northern European-like Mesolithic population (Ajv52, Ajv70, and Bra1), and Mediterranean-like Neolithic (Oetzi and Gok4) one.

Ancient European DNA assessment with 'globe10'

I had previously assessed the same using globe4. See post on globe10 and associated spreadsheet.

The results appear similar to previous analyses overall, with the main features being the presence of "Southern" in Neolithic farmers (which peaks in the Near East), and its absence in hunter-gatherers. Some of the "Amerindian"-like admixture that was evident in globe4 has been "absorbed" by the Atlantic_Baltic (main European) component, but it is interesting that the Swedish hunter-gatherers (Ajv52/Ajv70) continue to show some Amerindian as well as other eastern (Australasian/South Asian) admixture that is lacking in the other samples. These individuals are outside the range of modern populations, but they overall tend to map to the most similar Atlantic_Baltic component with the addition of some eastern influences.

Also of interest is the fact the Oetzi is the only sample which shows a slice of West Asian (5.7%) admixture in this analysis. This was also the case in the previous one using K7b (1.4%). Gok4, on the other hand, the fellow Neolithic individual from Sweden seems to lack this. The arrangement of the Big Three West Eurasian components (Southern/West Asian/Atlantic_Baltic) has subtly changed in this calculator, but it would be tempting, nonetheless, to see in the little West Asian admixture that Oetzi has but Gok4 and the Mesolithic samples seem to lack, something of the vanguard of the arrival of the West Asian component in Europe. Obviously more samples are needed, including ones from the most interesting regions of the Balkans and Anatolia.

Ancient European DNA assessment with 'globe4'

In a previous experiment, I showed that ADMIXTURE at K=4 tracks the same signal of Amerindian-like admixture detected with f-statistics. I encapsulated that analysis in the globe4 calculator over at the Dodecad Project blog, and decided to use it to assess a few ancient European autosomal samples:

Please note that a very variable number of SNPs was extracted from these various samples. These results should be viewed as indicative of possible patterns that might be confirmed by a more thorough analysis. Also, please consult the globe4 post for more details on the methodology behind it, and the interpretation of the 4 components.

With these various caveats, I would say that these results seem to make some sense and to be fairly consistent with the scenario of Patterson et al. (2012):

• Oetzi and Gok4, the "farmers" seem to lack the Amerindian component
• Ajv52, and Ajv70, the northern hunter-gatherers seem to possess it
• Bra1, the Mesolithic Iberian seems to lack it as well

Bra1 also happens to be the most limited sample in terms of available SNPs. Nonetheless, this would appear broadly consistent with the idea that the "Amerindian"-like admixture in Europeans emanated from north-eastern Europe. Today, all continental Europeans seem to possess some of it, but this can be explained by migration of Ajv-like individuals and their mixtures into Western and Southern Europe from central or northern Europe for which there is ample historical and archaeological evidence (e.g., Italo-Celts, Germans, and Slavs, in addition to other, earlier phenomena).

A broader context

The absence of the Amerindian-like admixture in South Indian Brahmins and Armenians, and its paucity Kurds and Iranians might indicate that this type of ancestry was not represented in ancient Armenians and Indo-Iranians. Indeed, all these populations possess less of this admixture than those of the North Caucasus. Cypriots possess none of it as well, where the Greek_D sample, a small 2.5% portion. In a previous analysis, I estimated a historical-era estimate of North European admixture in Greeks, and this admixture presumably incorporates the signal of Amerindian-like admixture. Additionally, an Iron Age individual from Bulgaria will soon be announced as being Sardinian-like.

The sum of these factors leads me to believe that the signal of Amerindian-like admixture did not play an important role in the formation of the Graeco-Phrygians (and their Armenian relatives) and the Indo-Iranians, or at least did so to an insignificant degree. As the former expanded westward from the PIE homeland, and the latter eastward, they would have had little opportunity to encounter this type of admixture; rather, they would have admixed with Sardinian-like individuals in the west, and Ancestral South Indian (ASI)-like or East Asian individuals in the east.

On the other hand, as Indo-European groups expanded into eastern Europe, setting off a chain of events that would eventually transform most of the northern part of the continent, and, in historical times, much of the rest of it, they would have met with Ajv-like individuals carrying the signal of Amerindian-like admixture, as well as the Oetzi/Sardinian-like farmers that had spread all the way to Scandinavia by the late Neolithic. The population formed by this mixture would have carried with it the signal of Amerindian-like ancestry, and would then transpose it across the continent. The signal would become increasingly muted westward and southward, and indeed this is what we observe.

UPDATE: It is interesting to see that South Indian Brahmins (both the Metspalu et al. sample, and my Iyer_D and Iyengar_D samples) lack this admixture, while Uttar Pradesh Brahmins do not, given the rolloff evidence for a more recent admixture of the latter. This is consistent with a historical admixture event, after the migration of Brahmin groups southwards, as described in that post.

Out-of-Iberia (Arenas et al. 2012)

A new paper argues that the SE-NW gradient of genetic variation in modern Europeans is consistent with a large Paleolithic contribution of the European gene pool if modern Europeans are principally descended from people who spent the last Ice Age in the Iberian refugium.

In my opinion, the question cannot be solved on the basis of modern populations alone: clines do not carry dates, and can be formed by accretion of different events operating under the constraints of a given geography. Ancient DNA has already begun to inform our view of the past:  we now have data from Mesolithic Iberians, the presumable denizens of a pre-farming refugium, and they do not appear closely related to modern Iberians. Moreover, Europe as a whole shows discontinuity between Neolithic and Mesolithic populations, and even between Neolithic and modern ones.

If humans expanded from Iberia in postglacial times, and modern Europeans are largely descended from them, then it is strange that the gene pool of Mesolithic Europeans  is so restricted: why didn't the Out-of-Iberians create a modern European-like mtDNA and Y chromosome gene pool in the thousands of years intervening between deglaciation and the available DNA samples?

Arguably, the ancient DNA record of Europe (except in the case of mtDNA) is still in its infancy and there may be more surprises to come. But, the way things look like right now, Paleolithic genetic continuity does not seem warranted. As more ancient samples accumulate from different regions and different periods, we will see how clines of variation in modern populations were formed. But, if history of the field is any guide, we're probably in for a few strange surprises.


Mol Biol Evol (2012) doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss203

Influence of admixture and Paleolithic range contractions on current European diversity gradients

Miguel Arenas et al.

Cavalli-Sforza and colleagues (1963) initiated the representation of genetic relationships among human populations with principal component analysis (PCA).Their study revealed the presence of a southeast–northwest (SE-NW) gradient of genetic variation in current European populations, which was interpreted as the result of the demic diffusion of early Neolithic farmers during their expansion from the Near East. However, this interpretation has been questioned, as PCA gradients can occur even when there is no expansion, and because the first PC axis is often orthogonal to the expansion axis. Here, we revisit PCA patterns obtained under realistic scenarios of the settlement of Europe, focusing on the effects of various levels of admixture between Paleolithic and Neolithic populations, and of range contractions during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Using extensive simulations, we find that the first PC (PC1) gradients are orthogonal to the expansion axis, but only when the expansion is recent (Neolithic). More ancient (Paleolithic) expansions alter the orientation of the PC1 gradient due to a spatial homogenization of genetic diversity over time, and to the exact location of LGM refugia from which re-expansions proceeded. Overall we find that PC1 gradients consistently follow a SE-NW orientation if there is a large Paleolithic contribution to the current European gene pool, and if the main refuge area during the last ice age was in the Iberian Peninsula. Our study suggests that a SE-NW PC1 gradient is compatible with little genetic impact of Neolithic populations on the current European gene pool, and that range contractions have affected observed genetic patterns.

Link

Mesolithic Iberians (La Braña-Arintero) not ancestors of modern ones

From the press release:

A team of scientists, led by researcher Carles Lalueza-Fox from CSIC (Spanish National Research Council), has recovered - for the first time in history - part of the genome of two individuals living in the Mesolithic Period, 7000 years ago. Remains have been found at La Braña-Arintero site, located at Valdelugueros (León), Spain. The study results, published in the Current Biology magazine, indicate that current Iberian populations don't come from these groups genetically.

This appears quite consistent with my model of mostly recent origins of European populations from a West Asian womb of nations. I can't wait to get my hands on this new data.

From the paper:

In the genomic analysis, it is interesting to see that the La Braña individuals do not cluster with modern populations from Southern Europe, including those from the Iberian Peninsula. The first PC separates a north-south distribution, whereas the second follows a general east-west pattern in modern Europeans. The position of La Braña individuals in the 1000 Genomes Project data and the 1KGPomnichip PCAs suggests that the uniform Mesolithic substrate could be related to modern Northern European populations but may represent a gene pool that is no longer present in contemporary Southern European populations. In the latter PCA, where the origin of each Iberian sample is known, it is possible to see that the Mesolithic specimens are not related to modern Basques, contrary to what has been previously suggested in some recent studies [39].

The global PCA of the two individuals shows a clear shift relative to extant Europeans.

So while they are more related to Northern than to Southern Europeans, they are well outside the range of modern European variation. Indeed, there is a strong hint of "Asian-shift" to these individuals. This is completely consistent with the pattern in modern West Eurasian populations. As I noted:

With respect to the Asian- and African- shift of West Eurasian populations, I note that northern Europeans (and Basques) are less African-shifted than southern Europeans, and, at the same time they are more Asian-shifted: the 16 least Asian-shifted populations have a coastline in the Mediterranean (excluding the Portuguese), while the 16 least African-shifted populations do not (excluding the French).

It now appears clear that the Mesolithic substratum in Europe was:

1. Well outside the modern range, contributing a little to extant populations
2. Its contribution in northern populations was higher than in southern ones
3. It may be responsible for the pattern of Asian-shift observed for non-Mediterranean European populations

Related: Coverage in Science.


UPDATE: Due to the small number of SNPs, I pooled the two Mesolithic individuals into a single composite one; the K7b admixture proportions are: 9.3% African and 90.7% Atlantic_Baltic, which appears consistent with the position of the individuals in the European PCA plot. The sub-1,000 SNPs in common with the K7b do not give me a lot of confidence in the minority element, but, in any case, the high Atlantic_Baltic figure is what I would expect and appears consistent with the similarly high Atlantic_Baltic figure of the Swedish Neolithic hunter-gatherers.


UPDATE II: Using the K12b, the results are: 45% Atlantic_Med, 41.6% North_European, 10.3% East_African, 1% Sub_Saharan.


UPDATE III: In terms of the euro7 calculator, the results are: 89.6% Northwestern, 1.6% Southeastern, and 8.7% Far_Asian.

Current Biology, 28 June 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.005

Genomic Affinities of Two 7,000-Year-Old Iberian Hunter-Gatherers

Federico Sánchez-Quinto, Hannes Schroeder, Oscar Ramirez, María C. Ávila-Arcos, Marc Pybus, Iñigo Olalde, Amhed M.V. Velazquez, María Encina Prada Marcos, Julio Manuel Vidal Encinas, Jaume Bertranpetit, Ludovic Orlando, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Carles Lalueza-Fox


Highlights

• The first complete Mesolithic mtDNA genome retrieved 
• There is a remarkable genetic uniformity in Europe during the Mesolithic period 
• Modern Iberians are not direct descendants of the 7,000-year-old hunter-gatherers 
• Genetic discontinuity between Mesolithic/Neolithic populations supported by simulations 

Summary The genetic background of the European Mesolithic and the extent of population replacement during the Neolithic [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] is poorly understood, both due to the scarcity of human remains from that period [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] and the inherent methodological difficulties of ancient DNA research. However, advances in sequencing technologies are both increasing data yields and providing supporting evidence for data authenticity, such as nucleotide misincorporation patterns [19,20,21,22]. We use these methods to characterize both the mitochondrial DNA genome and generate shotgun genomic data from two exceptionally well-preserved 7,000-year-old Mesolithic individuals from La Braña-Arintero site in León (Northwestern Spain) [23]. The mitochondria of both individuals are assigned to U5b2c1, a haplotype common among the small number of other previously studied Mesolithic individuals from Northern and Central Europe. This suggests a remarkable genetic uniformity and little phylogeographic structure over a large geographic area of the pre-Neolithic populations. Using Approximate Bayesian Computation, a model of genetic continuity from Mesolithic to Neolithic populations is poorly supported. Furthermore, analyses of 1.34% and 0.53% of their nuclear genomes, containing about 50,000 and 20,000 ancestry informative SNPs, respectively, show that these two Mesolithic individuals are not related to current populations from either the Iberian Peninsula or Southern Europe. 

Link

SMBE 2012 abstracts (Part II)

Some more abstracts from SMBE 2012.

The Neolithic trace in mitochondrial haplogroup U8 

Joana Barbosa Pereira 1,2 , Marta Daniela Costa 1,2 , Pedro Soares 2 , Luísa Pereira 2,3 , Martin Brian Richards 1,4 1 Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2 Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal,  3 Faculdade de Medicina da  Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal,  4 School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK  

The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) still remains an important marker in the study of human history, especially if  considering the increasing amount of data available. Among the several questions regarding human history that are  under debate, the model of expansion of agriculture into Europe from its source in the Near East is still unclear. Recent  studies have indicated that clusters belonging to haplogroup K, a major clade from U8, might be related with the  Neolithic expansions. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the founder lineages of the Neolithic in Europe so that we may  understand the real genetic input of the first Near Eastern farmers in the current European population and comprehend  how agriculture spread so quickly throughout all Europe.  In order to achieve this goal, a total of 55 U8 samples from the Near East, Europe and North Africa were selected for  complete characterisation of mtDNA. A maximum-parsimonious phylogenetic tree was constructed using all published  sequences available so far. Coalescence ages of specific clades were estimated using ρ statistic, maximum likelihood  and Bayesian methods considering a mutation rate for the complete molecule corrected for purifying selection.   Our results show that U8 dates to ~37-54 thousand years ago (ka) suggesting that this haplogroup might have been  carried by the first modern humans to arrive in Europe, ~50 ka. Haplogroup K most likely originated in the Near East  ~23-32 ka where it might have remained during the Last Glacial Maximum, between 26-19 years ago. The majority of K  subclades date to the Late Glacial and are related with the repopulation of Europe from the southern refugia areas. Only  a few lineages appear to reflect post glacial, Neolithic or post-Neolithic expansions, mostly occurring within Europe. The  major part of the lineages dating to the Neolithic period seems to have an European origin with exception of haplogroup  K1a4 and K1a3. Clade K1a4 appears to be originated from the Near East where it also reaches its highest peak of  diversity. Despite the main clades of K1a4 arose in the Near East during the Late Glacial, its subclade K1a4a1 dates to  ~9-11 ka and is most likely related with the Neolithic dispersal to Europe. Similarly, K1a3 probably originated in the Near  East during the Late Glacial and its subclade K1a1a dispersed into Europe ~11-13 ka alongside with the expansion of  agriculture. 

Late Glacial Expansions in Europe revealed through the fine-resolution characterisation of mtDNA haplogroup  U8 

Marta Daniela Costa 1,2 , Joana Barbosa Pereira 1,2 , Pedro Soares 2 , Luisa Pereira 2,3 , Martin Brian Richards 1,4 1 Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 2 IPATIMUP - Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal,  3 Faculdade de  Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal,  4 School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield,  UK  

The maternally inherited and fast evolving mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecule is a highly informative tool with which  to reconstruct human prehistory. This has become even more true in recent years, as mtDNA based studies are  becoming more robust and powerful due to the availability of complete mtDNA genomes. These allow better mutation  rate estimates and fine-resolution characterisation of the phylogeography of mtDNA haplogroups, or named  clades.  MtDNA haplogroup K, the major subclade of U8, occurs at low frequencies through West Eurasian populations,  and is much more common in Ashkenazi Jews. However, the lack of variation on the first hypervariable segment (HVSI) has precluded any meaningful phylogeographic analysis to date. We therefore completely sequenced 50 haplogroup  K and 5 non-K U8 mtDNA samples from across Europe and the Near East, and combined them with 343 genomes  previously deposited in GenBank, in order to reconstruct a detailed phylogenetic tree. By combining several inference  methods, including maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference it was possible to trace the  timescale and geography of the main expansions and dispersals associated with this lineage. We confirmed that  haplogroup K, dating to ~32 thousand years (ka) ago, descended from the U8 clade, which coalesces ~48 ka ago. The  latter is close to the timing of the first arrival of modern humans in Europe and U8 could be one of the few surviving  mtDNA lineages brought by the first settlers from the Near East. U8 split into the widespread U8b, at ~43 ka, and U8a,  which seems to have expanded only in Europe ~24 ka ago. Considering the pattern of diversity and the geographic  distribution, haplogroup K is most likely to have arisen in the Near East, ~32 ka ago. However, some subclades were  evidently carried to Europe during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). We observed significant expansions of haplogroup  K lineages in the Late Glacial period (14-19 ka), reflecting expansions out of refuge areas in southwest and possibly  also southeast Europe. 

Reticulated origin of domesticated tetraploid wheat 

Peter Civan Centro de Ciencias do Mar, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal  

The past 15 years have witnessed a notable scientific interest in the topic of crop domestication and the emergence of  agriculture in the Near East. Multi-disciplinary approaches brought a significant amount of new data and a multitude of  hypotheses and interpretations. However, some seemingly conflicting evidence, especially in the case of emmer wheat,  caused certain controversy and a broad scientific consensus on the circumstances of the wheat domestication has not  been reached, yet.  The past phylogenetic research has translated the issue of wheat domestication into somewhat simplistic mono- /polyphyletic dilemma, where the monophyletic origin of a crop signalizes rapid and geographically localized  domestication, while the polyphyletic evidence suggests independent, geographically separated domestication events.  Interestingly, the genome-wide and haplotypic data analyzed in several studies did not yield consistent results and the  proposed scenarios are usually in conflict with the archaeological evidence of lengthy domestication.  Here I suggest that the main cause of the above mentioned inconsistencies might lie in the inadequacy of the divergent,  tree-like evolutional model. The inconsistent phylogenetic results and implicit archaeological evidence indicate a  reticulate (rather than divergent) origin of domesticated emmer. Reticulated genealogy cannot be properly represented  on a phylogenetic tree; hence different sets of samples and genetic loci are prone to conclude different domestication  scenarios. On a genome-wide super-tree, the conflicting phylogenetic signals are suppressed and the origin of  domesticated crop may appear monophyletic, leading to misinterpretations of the circumstances of the Neolithic  transition.  The network analysis of multi-locus sequence data available for tetraploid wheat clearly supports the reticulated origin of  domesticated emmer and durum wheat. The concept of reticulated genealogy of domesticated wheat sheds new light  onto the emergence of Near-Eastern agriculture and is in agreement with current archaeological evidence of protracted  and dispersed emmer domestication.

High-coverage population genomics of diverse African hunter-gatherers 

Joseph Lachance 1 , Benjamin Vernot 2 , Clara Elbers 1 , Bart Ferwerda 1 , Alain Froment 3 , Jean-Marie Bodo 4 , Godfrey  Lema 5 , Thomas Nyambo 5 , Timothy Rebbeck 1 , Kun Zhang 6 , Joshua Akey 2 , Sarah Tishkoff 1 1 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,  2 University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA,  3 IRD-MNHN, Musee  de l'Homme, Paris, France,  4 Ministere de la Recherche Scientifique et de l’Innovation, Yaounde, Cameroon,  5 Muhimbili  University College of Health Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,  6 University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA,  USA     

In addition to their distinctive subsistence patterns, African hunter-gatherers belong to some of the most genetically  diverse populations on Earth.  To infer demographic history and detect signatures of natural selection, we sequenced  the whole genomes of five individuals in each of three geographically and linguistically diverse African hunter-gatherer  populations at >60x coverage.  In these 15 genomes we identify 13.4 million variants, many of which are novel,  substantially increasing the set of known human variation.  These variants result in allele frequency distributions that are  free of SNP ascertainment bias.  This genetic data is used to infer population divergence times and demographic history  (including population bottlenecks and inbreeding).  We find that natural selection continues to shape the genomes of  hunter-gatherers, and that deleterious genetic variation is found at similar levels for hunter-gatherers and African  populations with agricultural or pastoral subsistence patterns.  In addition, the genomes of each hunter-gatherer  population contain unique signatures of local adaptation.  These highly-divergent genomic regions include genes  involved in immunity, metabolism, olfactory and taste perception, reproduction, and wound healing.

Reconstructing past Native American genetic diversity in Puerto Rico from contemporary populations Marina Muzzio 1,2 , Fouad Zakharia 1 , Karla Sandoval 1 , Jake K. Byrnes 3 , Andres Moreno-Estrada 1 , Simon Gravel 1 , Eimear  Kenny 1 , Juan L. Rodriguez-Flores 5 , Chris R. Gignoux 6 , Wilfried Guiblet 4 , Julie Dutil 7 , The 1000 Genomes Consortium 0 ,  Andres Ruiz-Linares 8 , David Reich 9,10 , Taras K. Oleksyk 4 , Juan Carlos Martinez-Cruzado 4 , Esteban Gonzalez  Burchard 6 , Carlos D. Bustamante 1 1 Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA,  2 Facultad de Ciencias  Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina,  3 Ancestry. com®, San Francisco,  California, USA,  4 Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico,  5 Department  of Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA,  6 Institute for Human Genetics,  University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA,  7 Ponce School of Medicine, Ponce, Puerto Rico, 8 Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment. University College London, London, UK,  9 Department of  Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,  10 Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge,  Massachusetts, USA  

The Caribbean region has a rich cultural and biological diversity, including several countries with different languages,  and important historical events like the arrival of the Europeans in the late fifteenth century affected it deeply. Although it  has been said that two main Native American groups peopled the Caribbean at the time of Columbus’s voyages—the  Arawakan-speaking Tainos and the Caribs—this model has been questioned because it comes from the descriptions  written by the conquerors. The archaeological record shows a richer picture of trade among the islands, cultural change  and diversity than what colonial documents depict, from the early settlements around 8000 B.P. to the chiefdoms and  towns at the time of contact. How this area was peopled and how its inhabitants interacted with the surrounding  continent are questions that remain to be answered due to the fragmentary nature of the historical and archaeological  records.   
We aim to reconstruct the Native American genetic diversity from the time of the Spanish arrival at the island of Puerto  Rico from its contemporary population. We seek to find out how the original peopling of Puerto Rico occurred, along  with which contemporary Native American populations are the most closely related to the Native tracks found. We used  PCAdmix to trace Native American segments in admixed individuals, thus enabling us to reconstruct the original native  lineages previous to the European and African contact.   

Specifically, we generated local ancestry calls for the 70 parents of the 35 complete Puerto Rican trios from the wholegenome and Illumina Omni 2.5M chip Genotype data of the 1000 Genomes Project, both to examine genome-wide  admixture patterns and to infer demographic historical events from ancestry tract length distributions and an ancestryspecific PCA approach, adding 55 Native American groups as potential source populations (N=475 genotyped through  Illumina’s 650K array) and 15 selected Mexican trios (genotyped on Affymetrix’s 6.0 array, including about 906,000  SNPs) to provide population context. ADMIXTURE analysis has shown that in Puerto Rico there is no single source of  contribution for the Native component. Rather, this component seems to include a mixture of major Mexican and  Andean components with little contributions from the Amazonian isolates. On the other hand, the ancestry-specific PCA  plotted the Puerto Rican Native segments tightly clustered with the Native segments of groups from the same language  family as the Tainos (Equatorial-Tucanoan), showing a clear association between linguistics and genetics instead of a  geographical one.

 Inference of demographic history and natural selection in African Pygmy populations from whole-genome  sequencing data

 Martin Sikora 1 , Etienne Patin 2 , Helio Costa 1 , Katherine Siddle 2 , Brenna M Henn 1 , Jeffrey M Kidd 1,3 , Ryosuke Kita 1 ,  Carlos D Bustamante 1 , Lluis Quintana-Murci 2 1 Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Stanford Uni, Stanford, CA, USA,  2 Unit of Human Evolutionary Genetics,  Institut Pasteur, CNRS URA3012, Paris, France,  3 Departments of Human Genetics and Computational Medicine and  Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA     

The Pygmy populations of Central Africa are some of the last remaining hunter-gatherers among present-day human  populations, and can be broadly classified into two geographically separated groups, the Western and Eastern Pygmies.  Compared to their neighboring populations of predominantly Bantu origin, Pygmy populations show distinct cultural and  physical characteristics, most notably short stature, often referred to as the “Pygmy phenotype”. Given their distinct  physical characteristics, the questions of the demographic history and origin of the Pygmy phenotype have attracted  much attention. Previous studies have shown an ancient divergence (~60,000 years ago) of the ancestors of modernday Pygmies from non-Pygmies, and a more recent split of the Eastern and Western Pygmy groups. However, these  studies were generally based on a relatively small set of markers, precluding accurate estimations of demographic  parameters. Furthermore, despite the considerable interest, to date there is still little known about the genetic basis of  the small stature phenotype of Pygmy populations.   

In order to address these questions, we sequenced the genomes of 47 individuals from three populations: 20 Baka, a  Pygmy hunter-gatherer population from the Western subgroup of the African Pygmies; 20 Nzebi, a neighboring nonPygmy agriculturist population from the Bantu ethnolinguistic group; as well as 7 Mbuti, Eastern Pygmy population, from  the Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP). We performed whole-genome sequencing using Illumina Hi-Seq 2000 to  a median sequencing depth of 5.5x per individual. After stringent quality control filters, we call over 17 Million SNPs  across the three populations, 32% of them novel (relative to dbSNP 132). Genotype accuracy after imputation was  assessed using genotype data from the Illumina OMNI1 SNP array, and error rates were found to be comparable to  other low-coverage studies (< 3% for most individuals). Preliminary results show relatively low genetic differentiation  between the Baka and the Nzebi (mean FST = 0.026), whereas the Mbuti show higher differentiation to both Baka and  Nzebi (mean FST = 0.060 and 0.070, respectively). Furthermore, we find that alleles previously found to be associated with height in other populations are not enriched for the “small” alleles in the Pygmy populations. We find a number of  highly differentiated genomic regions as candidate loci for height differentiation, which will be verified using simulations  under the best-fit demographic model, inferred from multi-dimensional allele frequency spectra using DaDi. Our dataset  will allow a detailed investigation of the demographic history and the genomics of adaptation in these populations.

Genetic structure in North African human populations and the gene flow to Southern Europe

Laura R Botigué 1 , Brenna M Henn 2 , Simon Gravel 2 , Jaume Bertranpetit 1 , Carlos D Bustamante 2 , David Comas 1 1 Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (IBE, CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain,  2 Stanford University, Stanford CA, USA Despite being in the African continent and at the shores of the Mediterranean, North African populations might have  experienced a different population history compared to their neighbours. However, the extent of their genetic divergence  and gene flow from neighbouring populations is poorly understood. In order to establish the genetic structure of North  Africans and the gene flow with the Near East, Europe and sub-Saharan Africa, a genomewide SNP genotyping array  data (730,000 sites) from several North African and Spanish populations were analysed and compared to a set of  African, European and Middle Eastern samples. We identify a complex pattern of autochthonous, European, Near  Eastern, and sub-Saharan components in extant North African populations; where the autochthonous component  diverged from the European and Near Eastern component more than 12,000 years ago, pointing to a pre-Neolithic  ‘‘back-to-Africa’’ gene flow. To estimate the time of migration from sub-Saharan populations into North Africa, we  implement a maximum likelihood dating method based on the frequency and length distribution of migrant tracts, which  has suggested a migration of western African origin into Morocco ~1,200 years ago and a migration of individuals with  Nilotic ancestry into Egypt ~ 750 years ago.  We characterize broad patterns of recent gene flow between Europe and Africa, with a gradient of recent African  ancestry that is highest in southwestern Europe and decreases in northern latitudes. The elevated shared African  ancestry in SW Europe (up to 20% of the individuals’ genomes) can be traced to populations in the North African  Maghreb. Our results, based on both allele-frequencies and shared haplotypes, demonstrate that recent migrations from  North Africa substantially contribute to the higher genetic diversity in southwestern Europe

Estimating a date of mixture of ancestral South Asian populations

Priya Moorjani 1,2 , Nick Patterson 2 , Periasamy Govindaraj 3 , Danish Saleheen 4 , John Danesh 4 , Lalji Singh* 3,5 ,  Kumarasamy Thangaraj* 3 , David Reich* 1,2 1 Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,  2 Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA,  3 Centre for  Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India,  4 Dept of Public Health and Care, University of  Cambridge, Cambridge, UK,  5 Genome Foundation, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India Linguistic and genetic studies have demonstrated that almost all groups in South Asia today descend from a mixture of  two highly divergent populations: Ancestral North Indians (ANI) related to Central Asians, Middle Easterners and  Europeans, and Ancestral South Indians (ASI) not related to any populations outside the Indian subcontinent. ANI and  ASI have been estimated to have diverged from a common ancestor as much as 60,000 years ago, but the date of the  ANI-ASI mixture is unknown. Here we analyze data from about 60 South Asian groups to estimate that major ANI-ASI  mixture occurred 1,200-4,000 years ago. Some mixture may also be older—beyond the time we can query using  admixture linkage disequilibrium—since it is universal throughout the subcontinent: present in every group speaking  Indo-European or Dravidian languages, in all caste levels, and in primitive tribes. After the ANI-ASI mixture that  occurred within the last four thousand years, a cultural shift led to widespread endogamy, decreasing the rate of  additional mixture.   

Long IBD in Europeans and recent population history 

Peter Ralph, Graham Coop  UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA  

Numbers of common ancestors shared at various points in time across populations  can tell us about recent demography, migration, and population movements.  These rates of shared ancestry over tens of generations can be inferred from  genomic data, thereby dramatically increasing our ability to infer population  history much more recent than was previously possible with population genetic  techniques.  We have analyzed patterns of IBD in a dataset of thousands of  Europeans from across the continent, which provide a window into recent  European geographic structure and migration.   

Gene flow between human populations during the exodus from Africa, and the timeline of recent human  evolution  

Aylwyn Scally, Richard Durbin  Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK 

We present a novel test for historical gene flow between populations using unphased genotypes in present-day  individuals, based on the sharing of derived alleles and making a minimal set of assumptions about their demographic  history. We apply this test to data for three human individuals of African, European and Asian ancestry. We find that the  joint distribution of European and Asian genotypes is compatible with these populations having separated cleanly at  some time in the past without subsequent genetic exchange. However the same is not true of the European-African and  Asian-African distributions, which instead suggest an extended period of continued exchange between African and nonAfrican populations after their initial separation. 

We discuss this in comparison with recent models and estimates of separation time between these populations. We  also consider the impact of recent direct experimental studies of the human mutation rate, which suggest rates of  around 0.5 × 10 -9  bp -1  y -1 , substantially lower than prior estimates of 1 × 10 -9  bp -1  y -1  obtained from calibration against  the primate fossil record. We show that in several places the lower rate, implying older dates, yields better agreement  between genetic and non-genetic (paleoanthropological and archaeological) evidence for events surrounding the  exodus of modern humans from Africa and their dispersion worldwide.

Long-term presence versus recent admixture: Bayesian and approximate-Bayesian analyses of genetic  diversity of human populations in Central Asia 

Friso Palstra, Evelyne Heyer, Frederic Austerlitz  Eco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie UMR 7206 CNRS, Equipe Genetique des Populations Humaines, Museum National  d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France 

A long-standing goal in population genetics is to unravel the relative importance of evolutionary forces that shape  genetic diversity. Here we focus on human populations in Central Asia, a region that has long been known to contain  the highest genetic diversity on the Eurasian continent. However, whether this variation principally reflects long-term  presence, or rather the result of admixture associated with repeated migrations into this region in more recent historical  times, remains unclear. Here we investigate the underlying demographic history of Central Asian populations in explicit  relation to Western Europe, Eastern Asia and the Middle East. For this purpose we employ both full Bayesian and  approximate-Bayesian analyses of nuclear genetic diversity in 20 unlinked non-coding resequenced DNA regions,  known to be at least 200 kb apart from any known gene, mRNA or spliced EST (total length of 24 kb), and 22 unlinked  microsatellite loci.   

Using an approximate Bayesian framework, we find that present patterns of genetic diversity in Central Asia may be  best explained by a demographic history which combines long-term presence of some ethnic groups (Indo-Iranians)  with a more recent admixed origin of other groups (Turco-Mongols). Interestingly, the results also provide indications  that this region might have genetically influenced Western European populations, rather than vice versa. A further  evaluation in MCMC-based Bayesian analyses of isolation-with-migration models confirms the different times of  establishment of ethnic groups, and suggests gene flow into Central Asia from the east. The results from the  approximate Bayesian and full Bayesian analyses are thus largely congruent. In conclusion, these analyses illustrate  the power of Bayesian inference on genetic data and suggest that the high genetic diversity in Central Asia reflects both  long-term presence and admixture in more recent historical times. 

Population structure and evidence of selection in the Khoe-San and Coloured populations from southern Africa 

Carina Schlebusch 1 , Pontus Skoglund 1 , Per Sjödin 1 , Lucie Gattepaille 1 , Sen Li 1 , Flora Jay 2 , Dena Hernandez 3 , Andrew  Singleton 3 , Michael Blum 2 , Himla Soodyall 4,5 , Mattias Jakobsson 1 1 Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden,  2 Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France,  3 National Institute on Aging (NIH),  Bethesda, USA,  4 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa,  5 National Health Laboratory Service,  Johannesburg, South Africa  

The San and Khoe people currently represent remnant groups of a much larger and widely distributed population of  hunter-gatherers and pastoralists who had exclusive occupation of southern Africa before the arrival of Bantu-speaking  groups in the past 1,200 years and sea-borne immigrants within the last 350 years. Mitochondrial DNA, Y-chromosome  and autosomal studies conducted on a few San groups revealed that they harbour some of the most divergent lineages  found in living peoples throughout the world.   

We used autosomal data to characterize patterns of genetic variation among southern African individuals in order to  understand human evolutionary history, in particular the demographic history of Africa. To this end, we successfully  genotyped ~ 2.3 million genome wide SNP markers in 220 individuals, comprising seven Khoe-San, two Coloured and  two Bantu-speaking groups from southern Africa. After quality filtering, the data were combined with publicly available  SNP data from other African populations to investigate stratification and demography of African populations.  

We also  applied a newly developed method of estimating population topology and divergence times. Genotypes and inferred  haplotypes were used to assess genetic diversity, patterns of haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in different  populations.  We found that six of the seven Khoe-San populations form a common population lineage basal to all other modern  human populations. The studied Khoe-San populations are genetically distinct, with diverse histories of gene flow with  surrounding populations. A clear geographic structuring among Khoe-San groups was observed, the northern and  southern Khoe-San groups were most distinct from each other with the central Khoe-San group being intermediate. The  Khwe group contained variation that distinguished it from other Khoe-San groups. Population divergence within the  Khoe-San group is approximately 1/3 as ancient as the divergence of the Khoe-San as a whole to other human  populations (on the same order as the time of divergence between West Africans and Eurasians). Genetic diversity in  some, but not all, Khoe-San populations is among the highest worldwide, but it is influenced by recent admixture. We  furthermore find evidence of a Nilo-Saharan ancestral component in certain Khoe-San groups, possibly related to the  introduction of pastoralism to southern Africa.   

We searched for signatures of selection in the different population groups by scanning for differentiated genome-regions  between populations and scanning for extended runs of haplotype homozygosity within populations. By means of the  selection scans, we found evidence for diverse adaptations in groups with different demographic histories and modes of  subsistence. 

Impacts of life-style on human evolutionary history: A genome-wide comparison of herder and farmer  populations in Central Asia 

Michael C. Fontaine 1,2 , Laure Segurel 2,3 , Christine Lonjou 4 , Tatiana Hegay 5 , Almaz Aldashev 6 , Evelyne Heyer 2 , Frederic  Austerlitz 1,2 1 Ecology, Systematics & Evolution. UMR8079 Univ. Paris Sud - CNRS - AgroParisTech, Orsay, France,  2 EcoAnthropologie et Ethnobiologie, UMR 7206 CNRS, MNHN, Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France, 3 Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA,  4 C2BiG (Centre de  Bioinformatique/Biostatistique Genomique d’Ile de France), Plateforme Post-genomique P3S, Hopital Pitie Salpetriere,  Paris, France,  5 Uzbek Academy of Sciences, Institute of Immunology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan,  6 Institute of Molecular  Biology and Medicine, National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Bishkek,  

Kyrgyzstan Human populations use a variety of subsistence strategies to exploit an exceptionally broad range of habitats and  dietary components. These aspects of human environments have changed dramatically during human evolution, giving  rise to new selective pressures. Here we focused on two populations in Central Asia with long-term contrasted lifestyles:  Kyrgyz’s that are traditionally nomadic herders, with a traditional diet based on meat and milk products, and Tajiks that  are traditionally agriculturalists, with a traditional diet based mostly on cereals. We genotyped 93 individuals for more  than 600,000 SNP markers (Human-660W-Quad-V1.0 from Illumina) spread across the genome. We first analysed the  population structure of these two populations in the world-wide context by combining our results with other available  genome-wide data. Principal component and Bayesian clustering analyses revealed that Tajiks and Kirgiz’s are both  admixed populations which differed however from each other with respect to their ancestry proportions: Tajiks display a  much larger proportion of common ancestry with European populations while Kirgiz’s share a larger common ancestry  with Asiatic populations. We then examined the region of the genome displaying unusual population differentiation  between these two populations to detect natural selection and checked whether they were specific to Central Asia or  not. We complemented these analyses with haplotype-based analyses of selection. 

Bayesian inference of the demographic history of Niger-Congo speaking populations 

Isabel Alves 1,2 , Lounès Chikhi 2,3 , Laurent Excoffier 1,4 1 CMPG, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Berne, Switzerland,  2 Population and Conservation Genetics Group, Instituto  Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal,  3 CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, ENFA, Toulouse, France,  4 Swiss Institute of  Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland  

The Niger-Congo phylum encompasses more than 1500 languages spread over sub-Saharan Africa. This current wide  range is mostly due to the spread of Bantu-speaking people across sub-equatorial regions in the last 4000-5000 years.  Although several genetic studies have focused on the evolutionary history of Bantu-speaking groups, much less effort  has been put into the relationship between Bantu and non-Bantu Niger-Congo groups. Additionally, archaeological and  linguistic evidence suggest that the spread of these populations occurred in distinct directions from the core region  located in what is now the border between Nigeria and Cameroon towards West and South Africa, respectively. We  have performed coalescent simulations within an approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) framework in order to  statistically evaluate the relative probability of alternative models of the spread of Niger-Congo speakers and to infer  demographic parameters underlying these important migration events. We have analysed 61 high-quality microsatellite  markers, genotyped in 130 individuals from three Bantu and three non Bantu-speaking populations, representing a  "Southern wave" or the Bantu expansion, and a "Western wave", respectively. Preliminary results suggest that models  inspired by a spatial spread of the populations are better supported than classical isolation with migration (IM) models.  We also find that Niger-Congo populations currently maintain high levels of gene flow with their neighbours, and that  they expanded from a single source between 200 and 600 generations, even though available genetic data do not  provide enough information to accurately infer these demographic parameters.

A genetic study of skin pigmentation variation in India  

Mircea Iliescu1 , Chandana Basu Mallick 2,3 , Niraj Rai 4 , Anshuman Mishra 4 , Gyaneshwer Chaubey 2 , Rakesh Tamang 4 ,  Märt Möls 3 , Rie Goto 1 , Georgi Hudjashov 2,3 , Srilakshmi Raj 1 , Ramasamy Pitchappan 5 , CG Nicholas Mascie-Taylor 1 , Lalji  Singh 4,6 , Marta Mirazon-Lahr 7 , Mait Metspalu 2,3 , Kumarasamy Thangaraj 4 , Toomas Kivisild 1,3 1 Division of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK,  2 Evolutionary Biology Group, Estonian  Biocentre, Tartu, Estonia,  3 Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia,  4 Centre for Cellular  and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India,  5 Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Chettinad Health City,  Chennai, India,  6 Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India,  7 Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies,  Division of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK  

Human skin colour is a polygenic trait that is primarily determined by the amount and type of melanin produced in the  skin. The pigmentation variation between human populations across the world is highly correlated with geographic  latitude and the amount of UV radiation. Association studies together with research involving different model organisms  and coat colour variation have largely contributed to the identification of more than 378 pigmentation candidate genes.  These include TYR OCA2, that are known to cause albinism, MC1R responsible for the red hair phenotype, and genes  such as MATP, SLC24A5 and ASIP that are involved in normal pigmentation variation. In particular, SLC24A5 has been  shown to explain one third of the pigmentation difference between Europeans and Africans. However, the same gene  cannot explain the lighter East Asian phenotype; therefore, light pigmentation could be the result of convergent  evolution. A study on UK residents of Pakistani, Indian and Bangladeshi descent found significant association of  SLC24A5, SLC45A2 and TYR genes with skin colour. While these genes may explain a significant proportion of  interethnic differences in skin colour, it is not clear how much variation such genes explain within Indian populations  who are known for their high level of diversity of pigmentation. We have tested 15 candidate SNPs for association with  melanin index in a large sample of 1300 individuals, from three related castes native to South India. Using logistic  regression model we found that SLC24A5 functional SNP, rs1426654, is strongly associated with pigmentation in our  sample and explains alone more than half of the skin colour difference between the light and the dark group of  individuals. Conversely, the other tested SNPs fail to show any significance; this strongly argues in favour of one gene  having a major effect on skin pigmentation within ethnic groups of South India, with other genes having small additional  effects on this trait. We genotyped the SLC24A5 variant in over 40 populations across India and found that latitudinal  differences alone cannot explain its frequency patterns in the subcontinent. Key questions arising from this research are  when and where did the light skin variant enter South Asia and the manner and reason for it spreading across the Indian  sub-continent. Hence, a comprehensive view of skin colour evolution requires that in depth sequence information be  corroborated with population (genetic) history and with ancient DNA data of past populations of Eurasia.