September 06, 2013

ASHG 2013 abstracts

Feel free to point me to more interesting abstracts than the ones I noticed during my "first pass".

Morphometric and ancient DNA study of human skeletal remanants in Indian Subcontinent.
N. Rai et al.
Recovery and sequencing of mtDNA from ancient human remnants is a daunting task but provides valuable information about human migrations and evolution. Our present study is the first to recover, amplify and sequence (HVR and coding regions of mtDNA) inadequately preserved and highly degraded (1.5 Ky to ≤1.0 Ky ago) hominids mitochondrial DNA of three most intriguing and indigenous ancient population of South and South-East Asia (Myanmar=20 Buried individuals, Nicobar Islands=15 and Andaman Island=6). Following all parameters and to avoid the chance of contamination we independently extracted and sequenced the DNA in two different labs and measured the cranial variability in all hominid skulls using 128 cranial landmarks, compiled 3D morphometrics, genetic data of ancient DNA samples and analyzed the admixture and genetic affinities of above three populations. Results showed the predominant frequency of F1a1 and complete absence of 9bp deletion in ancient Nicobarese. Unlike in previous reports on modern Nicobarese, the high frequency of F1a1 haplogroup in ancient Nicobarese show the probable migration of Nicobarese from South East Asia and the complete absence of 9bp deletion suggests the different events of settlement. This study failed to detect genetic affinities of Burmese with Nicolbarese even though their phenotype and language appears to be same. We first time report any kind of population study on Burmese populations and with the genetic affinity of Burmese with East Asian, East Indian (Including Gadhwal region of Himalaya) and Bangladeshi populations, we found significant admixture with West Eurasians. Our study strongly supports the West Eurasian and East Asian route of migration and settlement of early Burmese population. The three populations in the present study are quite different in their genetic structure but 3D morphometric study using huge number of landmarks explains a close homology among these populations and this can be explained by the role of climatic signature on these populations.
 Y chromosomes of ancient Hunnu people and its implication on the phylogeny of East Asian linguistic families. 
LL. Kang et al.
The Hunnu (Xiongnu) people, also called Huns in Europe, were the largest ethnic group to the north of Han Chinese until the 5th century. The ethno-linguistic affiliation of the Hunnu is controversial among Yeniseian, Altaic, Uralic, and Indo-European. Ancient DNA analyses on the remains of the Hunnu people had shown some clues to this problem. Y chromosome haplogroups of Hunnu remains included Q-M242, N-Tat, C-M130, and R1a1. Recently, we analyzed three samples of Hunnu from Barköl, Xinjiang, China, and determined Q-M3 haplogroup. Therefore, most Y chromosomes of the Hunnu samples examined by multiple studies are belonging to the Q haplogroup. Q-M3 is mostly found in Yeniseian and American Indian peoples, suggesting that Hunnu should be in the Yeniseian family. The Y chromosome diversity is well associated with linguistic families in East Asia. According to the similarity in the Y chromosome profiles, there are four pairs of congenetic families, i.e., Austronesian and Tai-Kadai, Mon-Khmer and Hmong-Mien, Sino-Tibetan and Uralic, Yeniseian and Palaesiberian. Between 4,000-2,000 years before present, Tai-Kadai, Hmong-Mien, Sino-Tibetan, and Yeniseian languages transformed into toned analytic languages, becoming quite different from the rest four. Since Hunnu was in the Yeniseian family, all these four toned families were distributed in the inland of China during the transformations. There must be some social or biological factors induced the transformations at that time, which is worth doing more linguistic and genetic researches.
Genomic scans for haplotypes of Denisova and Neanderthal ancestry in modern human populations.
F. L. Mendez, M. F. Hammer University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ., USA.
Evidence of archaic introgression into modern humans has accumulated in recent years. While most efforts to characterize the introgression process have relied on genome averages, only a small number of introgressive haplotypes have been shown to have an archaic origin after rejection of the alternative hypothesis of incomplete lineage sorting. Accurate identification of introgressive haplotypes is crucial both to characterize potentially functional consequences of archaic admixture and to quantify more precisely the genomic impact of archaic introgression. We perform two independent genomic scans for haplotypes of Denisova and of Neanderthal origin in a geographically diverse sample of complete genome sequences. These scans are based on the local sharing of polymorphisms and linkage disequilibrium, respectively. The analysis of concordance between the methods is then used to estimate the power and to compare demographic inference when performed using either all the data or just the genomic regions with no evidence of introgression. Moreover, we evaluate the extent to which Denisova haplotypes are observed in non-Melanesian populations, and investigate whether the presence of such haplotypes is better explained by their persistence in the population since introgression or by more recent gene flow from Melanesians.
Admixture Estimation in a Founder Population. 
Y. Banda1 et al.
Admixture between previously diverged populations yields patterns of genetic variation that can aid in understanding migrations and natural selection. An understanding of individual admixture (IA) is also important when conducting association studies in admixed populations. However, genetic drift, in combination with shallow allele frequency differences between ancestral populations, can make admixture estimation by the usual methods challenging. We have, therefore, developed a simple but robust method for ancestry estimation using a linear model to estimate allele frequencies in the admixed individual or sample as a function of ancestral allele frequencies. The model works well because it allows for random fluctuation in the observed allele frequencies from the expected frequencies based on the admixture estimation. We present results involving 3,366 Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) who are part of the Kaiser Permanente Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort and genotyped at 674,000 SNPs, and compare them to the results of identical analyses for 2,768 GERA African Americans (AA). For the analysis of the AJ, we included surrogate Middle Eastern, Italian, French, Russian, and Caucasus subgroups to represent the ancestral populations. For the African Americans, we used surrogate Africans and Northern Europeans as ancestors. For the AJ, we estimated mean ancestral proportions of 0.380, 0.305, 0.113, 0.041 and 0.148 for Middle Eastern, Italian, French, Russian and Caucasus ancestry, respectively. For the African Americans, we obtained estimated means of 0.745 and 0.248 for African and European ancestry, respectively. We also noted considerably less variation in the individual admixture proportions for the AJ (s.d. = .02 to .05) compared to the AA (s.d.= .15), consistent with an older age of admixture for the former. From the linear model regression analysis on the entire population, we also obtain estimates of goodness of fit by r2. For the analysis of AJ, the r2 was 0.977; for the analysis of the AA, the r2 was 0.994, suggesting that genetic drift has played a more prominent role in determining the AJ allele frequencies. This was confirmed by examination of the distribution of differences for the observed versus predicted allele frequencies. As compared to the African Americans, the AJ differences were significantly larger, and presented some outliers which may have been the target of selection (e.g. in the HLA region on chromosome 6p).
Admixture in the Pre-Columbian Caribbean. 
J. C. Martinez-Cruzado et al.
The biological origin of the Caribbean aborigines that greeted Columbus is one of the most controversial issues regarding the population history of this region. Genome studies suggest an Equatorial-Tucanoan origin, consistent with the Arawakan language spoken by most natives of the region. However, the archaeological evidence suggests an early arrival from Mesoamerica, and their admixture with the more recent Arawak-speaking group stemming from the Amazon remains a possibility. The lineages comprehending most Puerto Rican samples belonging to haplogroups B1 and C1, which in turn encompass 44% of all Native American mtDNAs in the island, have an unambiguous South American origin. However, none of those belonging to haplogroup A2, encompassing 52% of all Native American mtDNAs, have been related to South America or any other continental region. To augment the scarce data from Mesoamerican countries other than Mexico, we present the complete mtDNA sequence of 6 Honduran samples belonging to distinct control region lineages in addition to 3 from the Dominican Republic and 3 from Puerto Rico. Interestingly, maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction including 40 published haplogroup A2 sequence haplotypes from Mesoamerica, Central America and South America clusters 8 out of 10 Mesoamerican and Andean haplotypes in a deep rooted group, separate from, and excluding all Costa Rican, Panamian and Brasilian haplotypes, suggesting a relatively recent origin for Chibchan-Paezan and Amazonian groups. Furthermore, 4 of the 5 Greater Antillean A2 haplotypes are included in the deeply rooted Mesoamerican-Andean cluster. Moreover, the only Cuban haplotype in the literature and the remaining A2 haplotype from the Dominican Republic form even more deeply rooted private branches. Similarly, the only haplogroup C1d sample sequenced from the Dominican Republic forms a private branch with the deepest root in a maximum likelihood tree containing 19 additional C1d haplotypes from Mexico to Brasil plus the CRS. In conclusion, our preliminary results suggest that a substantial proportion of the Native American mtDNA lineages from the Greater Antilles do not share an Amazonian origin with the language their people spoke in 1492. Furthermore, the position of two Dominican lineages at the earliest split in both their respective trees suggests an early origin that could be explained by extensive lineage extinctions in Mesoamerica and the Andes or an origin in North America.
 The possible role of social selection in the distribution of the "Proto-Mongolian" haplotype in Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Mongols and other Eurasian populations.
M. Zhabagin et al.
Social factors may be important contributors to reproductive success and determination of the selective survival of individuals. Therefore, social selection and other social factors are important for understanding population structure and its formation. The role of social selection on the distribution and formation of Y-chromosomal gene pool has been studied. There is a strong connection between social selection and birth rate of the descendants, whose fathers had achieved high social status during the expansion of the Mongol Empire and associated historical events. A total of 783 haplotypes, including 687 newly obtained and 96 retrieved from the literature were assigned to the haplogroup C3*-M217 (xM48) based on genotyping 17 Y-chromosomal STR markers. These haplotypes represent 11 populations of Eurasia: Kazakhs, Mongols, Kyrgyz, Telengits, Circassians, Balkar, Temirgoys, Karachai, Evenki, Kizhi and the Pashtuns. As the result, a major haplotype 13-16-25-15-16-18-14-10-22-11-10-11-13-10-21 (DYS389a-DYS389b-DYS390-DYS456-DYS19-DYS458-DYS437-DYS438-DYS448-GATA4-DYS391-DYS392-DYS393-DYS439-DYS635, N=94) was found to have 12.00% frequency within haplogroup C3*. This haplotype includes and extends the previously described “star-cluster” haplotype. Noteworthy, the frequency of this major haplotype within haplogroup C3* was 16.80% in Kazakhs, 10.13% in Mongols and 2.63% in Kirgiz who are not considered as direct descendants of Genghis Khan. 35.10% of the major haplotype was represented by Kazakh tribe Ashamayly-Kerey, 17.02% by the Khalkh Mongols and 7.44% by the Barguts. Therefore, we suppose this major ancestral haplotype to be the "proto-Mongolian haplotype", inherited by Genghis Khan and his descendants. It is important to mention that Temujin belongs to Kiyat-Borjigin tribe that in turn is a branch of the bigger Borjigin tribe, part of the Khalkh Mongols. Thus, Genghis Khan might be considered as a carrier rather than founder of the star-cluster haplotype. He and his descendants are the ones who contributed to a positive effect of social selection in the distribution of this haplotype. Other examples are the Barguts, who had Genghis Khan’s credit and were granted with a number of privileges, or the Kerey, based on the fact that Temujin had been brought up at the court of the Togrul Khan, belonging to the Kerey tribe.
Y-chromosomal variation in native South Americans: bright dots on a gray canvas.
M. Nothnagel et al.
While human populations in Europe and Asia have often been reported to reveal a concordance between their extant genetic structure and the prevailing regional pattern of geography and language, such evidence is lacking for native South Americans. In the largest study of South American natives to date, we examined the relationship between Y-chromosomal genotype on the one hand, and male geographic origin and linguistic affiliation on the other. We observed virtually no structure for the extant Y-chromosomal genetic variation of South American males that could sensibly be related to their inter-tribal geographic and linguistic relationships, augmented by locally confined Y-STR autocorrelation. Analysis of repeatedly taken random subsamples from Europe adhering to the same sampling scheme excluded the possibility that this finding was due to our specific scheme. Furthermore, for the first time, we identified a distinct geographical cluster of Y-SNP lineages C-M217 (C3*) in South America, which are virtually absent from North and Central America, but occur at high frequency in Asia. Our data suggest a late introduction of C3* into South America no more than 6,000 years ago and low levels of migration between the ancestor populations of C3* carrier and non-carriers. Our findings are consistent with a rapid peopling of the continent, followed by long periods of isolation in small groups, and highlight the fact that a pronounced correlation between genetic and geographic/cultural structure can only be expected under very specific conditions.
The timing and history of Neandertal gene flow into modern humans. 
S. Sankararaman et al.
   Previous analyses of modern human variation in conjunction with the Neandertal genome have revealed that Neandertals contributed 1-4% of the genes of non-Africans with the time of last gene flow dated to 37,000-86,000 years before present. Nevertheless, many aspects of the joint demographic history of modern humans and Neandertals are unclear. We present multiple analyses that reveal details of the early history of modern humans since their dispersal out of Africa.
   1.We analyze the difference between two allele frequency spectra in non-Africans: the spectrum conditioned on Neandertals carrying a derived allele while Denisovans carry the ancestral allele and the spectrum conditioned on Denisovans carrying a derived allele while Neandertals carry the ancestral allele. This difference spectrum allows us to study the drift since Neandertal gene flow under a simple model of neutral evolution in a panmictic population even when other details of the history before gene flow are unknown. Applying this procedure to the genotypes called in the 1000 Genomes Project data, we estimate the drift since admixture in Europeans of about 0.065 and about 0.105 in East Asians. These estimates are quite close to those in the European and East Asian populations since they diverged, implying that the Neandertal gene flow occurred close to the time of split of the ancestral populations. 
   2.Assuming only one Neandertal gene flow event in the common ancestry of Europeans and East Asians, we estimate the drift since gene flow in the common ancestral population. We show that an upper bound on this shared drift is 0.018. Because this is far less than the drift associated with the out-of-Africa bottleneck of all non-African populations, this shows that the Neandertal gene flow occurred after the out-of-Africa bottleneck. 
   3.We use the genetic drift shared between Europeans and East Asians, in conjunction with the observation of large regions deficient in Neandertal ancestry obtained from a map of Neandertal ancestry in Eurasians, to estimate the number of generations and effective population size in the period immediately after gene flow. These analyses suggest that only a few dozen Neandertals may have contributed to the majority of Neandertal ancestry in non-Africans today.
Genetic characterisation of two Greek population isolates. 
K. Hatzikotoulas et al.
   Genetic association studies of low-frequency and rare variants can be empowered by focusing on isolated populations. It is important to genetically characterize population isolates for substructure and recent admixture events as these may give rise to spurious associations. Under the auspices of the HELlenic Isolated Cohorts study (HELIC; www.helic.org) we have collected >3,000 samples from two isolated populations in Greece: the Pomak villages (HELIC Pomak), a set of religiously-isolated mountainous villages in the North of Greece; and Anogia and surrounding mountainous villages on Crete (HELIC MANOLIS). All samples have information on anthropometric, cardiometabolic, biochemical, haematological and diet-related traits. 1,500 individuals from each population isolate have been typed on the Illumina OmniExpress and Human Exome Beadchip platforms. Multidimensional scaling analysis with the 1000 Genomes Project data shows similarities of the two population isolates with Mediterranean populations such as the Tuscans from Italy and Iberians from Spain. We also observe evidence for structure within the isolates, with the Kentavros village in the Pomak strand demonstrating high levels of differentiation. To characterise the degree of isolatedness in these populations we estimated the proportion of individuals with at least one “surrogate parent” (using only the subset of samples with pairwise pi-hat<0 .2="" 707="" adolescents="" an="" and="" at="" attica="" compared="" comprises="" district.="" find="" for="" from="" genome="" greek="" in="" individuals="" is="" isolate="" least="" manolis="" of="" one="" outbred="" parent="" population="" proportion="" random="" regions="" study="" surrogate="" teenage="" that="" the="" this="" to="" unrelated="" we="" which="" with="">60% and in the Pomak isolate is >65% compared to ~1% in the outbred Greek population. Our results establish these populations as isolates and provide some insights into the genomic architecture of Greek populations, which have not been previously characterised.
Efficient and Accurate Whole-Genome Human Phasing.
T. Blauwkamp et al.
   High throughput DNA sequencing allows whole human genomes to be resequenced rapidly and inexpensively producing a comprehensive list of variants relative to the reference genome. However, short read sequencing technologies are limited in their ability to determine phasing information, thus resulting in heterozygous calls being represented as the average of the maternal and paternal chromosomes. Phasing information is of critical importance to personal medicine as it provides a better linkage between genotype and phenotype, permitting new advances in our understanding of compound heterozygote linked diseases, pharmacogenomics, HLA typing, and prenatal genome sequencing. Here, we describe a new sample prep method that enables whole human genome haplotyping at high accuracy using only 30Gb of sequence data. Genomic DNA was fragmented into ~10Kb fragments, end repaired, and ligated to adapters. Hundreds of aliquots with approximately 50MB of DNA in each were amplified, fragmented and converted into individual shotgun libraries. The pooled libraries were sequenced in a single lane of a HiSeq2500 at 2x100bp to generate ~30Gb of sequence. The resulting sequence information was analyzed to obtain a set of long blocks of ~10Kb, covering multiple heterozygous SNPs, allowing phasing of these SNPs relative to each other. An HMM-based phasing algorithm was used to compute the most likely phase and confidence intervals based on the observed coverage and sequencer quality scores. Phasing of those blocks relative to each other was done by another HMM-based algorithm which uses a panel of previously phased genomes. Comparing our results with phase information inferred by transmission from the parents, we found that over 98% of heterozygous SNPs were phased within long blocks (N50=500kb) at a switch error rate below 1 switch per megabase of phased sequence. We present results obtained from multiple cell lines and human samples. This new library prep method and data analysis pipeline enables whole human genome phasing with only 30Gb of raw sequence, which represents only ~30% more sequencing than current 30x baseline run for human sequencing. Compared to other published reports, this method is capable of phasing a greater fraction of SNPS with ~75% less sequencing. Coupling our higher percentage of SNPs phased with high accuracy and the lowest sequencing requirement, this new technology is the most affordable approach to generating completely phased whole human genomes.
 Inference of Natural Selection and Demographic History for African Pygmy Hunter-Gatherers.
P. H. Hsieh et al.
   African Pygmies are hunter-gatherers primarily inhabiting the Central African rainforests, where they are exposed to high temperatures, high humidity, and a pathogen and parasite-enriched woody habitat. These factors undoubtedly influenced their evolutionary history as they adapted to this environment. Many Pygmy populations have historically been in socio-economic contact with neighboring Niger-Kordofanian speaking farmer populations, particularly since the agriculture expansion in sub-Saharan Africa that began five thousand years ago (kya). To look for the true signatures of adaptation to the rainforest habitat of pygmies we must control for this complex demographic history. We sequenced and combined 40x whole genome sequence data from 3 Baka pygmies from Cameroon, 4 Biaka pygmies from the Central African Republic, and 9 Niger-Kordofanian speaking Yoruba farmers from Nigeria. We used ?a?i, a model-based demographic inference tool, to infer the history of these populations. Our best-fit model suggests that the ancestors of the farmer and pygmy populations diverged 150 kya and remained isolated from each other until 40 kya. This divergence is more ancient than estimated by previous studies that included fewer loci, but is consistent with a PSMC analysis, a separate inference tool that uses different aspects of the genomic data than ?a?i. Interestingly, our analysis shows that models with bi-directional asymmetric gene flow between farmers and pygmies are statistically better supported than previously suggested models with a single wave of uni-directional migration from farmers to pygmies. To identify possible targets of positive selection, we conducted a genomic scan using complementary methods, including the frequency-spectrum based G2D test, the population differentiation based XP-CLR test, and the haplotype based iHS test. We performed 10,000 simulations based on the above best-fit demographic model in order to assign statistical significance to each reported target of natural selection. Our results reveal that genes involved in cell adhesion, cellular signaling, olfactory perception, and immunity were likely targeted by natural selection in the pygmies or their recent ancestors. Our analysis also shows that genes involved in the function of lipid binding are enriched in highly differentiated non-synonymous mutations, suggesting that this function may have acted differently on the Pygmies and farmers after their divergence from their common ancestor.
Population demography and maternal history of Oceania.
A. T. Duggan et al.
   We present a large-scale study of mtDNA diversity across Near and Remote Oceania with whole-genome mtDNA sequencing and a sample collection of more than 1,300 individuals spanning from the Bismarck Archipelago in the west to the Cook Islands in the east. As the location of at least two major migration events (initial colonization over 40,000 years ago, followed by an expansion of Austronesian-speaking migrants around 3,500 years ago), Oceania provides a unique opportunity to study the effects of population admixture. Our results support the idea of sex-biased admixture between the resident populations and the migrants of the Austronesian expansion. We find that haplogroups of putative Asian origin which are thought to have spread with the Austronesian expansion are found at high frequency in all but two populations and, in general, we see little evidence of distinction between Papuan and Austronesian speaking populations. Santa Cruz, which is part of the Solomon Islands but geographically distinct from the main island chain and considered part of Remote Oceania, has long been considered a linguistic oddity and is now accepted to represent a very deep branch in the Oceanic language family. We find that it is also a genetic outlier, with potential direct connections to the Bismarck Archipelago not evident in the main Solomon Islands chain. In this expanded dataset, we find additional evidence of instability and increased heteroplasmy at the ‘Polynesian motif’ position 16247, further confirming previous findings restricted to the Solomon Islands. 

 Reconstructing Austronesian population history. 
M. Lipson et al.
   Present-day populations that speak Austronesian languages are spread across half the globe, from Easter Island in the Pacific Ocean to Madagascar in the Indian Ocean. Evidence from linguistics and archaeology suggests that the "Austronesian expansion," a vast cultural and linguistic dispersal that began 4--5 thousand years ago, had its origin in Taiwan. However, genetic studies of Austronesian ancestry have been inconclusive, with some finding affinities with aboriginal Taiwanese, others advancing an autochthonous origin within Island Southeast Asia, and others proposing a model involving multiple waves of migration from Asia. Here, we analyze genome-wide data from a diverse set of 31 Austronesian-speaking and 25 other groups typed at 18,412 overlapping single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to trace the genetic origins of Austronesians. We use a recently developed computational tool for building phylogenetic models of population relationships incorporating the possibility of admixture, which allows us to infer ancestry proportions and sources of genetic material for 26 admixed Austronesian-speaking populations. Our analysis provides strong confirmation of widespread ancestry of Taiwanese origin: at least a quarter of the genetic material in all Austronesian-speaking populations that we studied---including all of the Asian ancestry in populations from eastern Indonesia and Oceania---is more closely related to aboriginal Taiwanese than to any populations we sampled from the mainland. Surprisingly, we also show that western Austronesian-speaking populations have inherited substantial proportions of their Asian ancestry from a source that falls within the variation of present-day Austro-Asiatic populations in Southeast Asia. No Austro-Asiatic languages are spoken in Island Southeast Asia today, although there are some linguistic and archaeological suggestions of an early connection between mainland and island populations. The most plausible explanation for these findings, in light of the historical evidence, is that western Island Southeast Asia was settled by Austronesian groups who had previously mixed with Austro-Asiatic speakers on the mainland.
 No significant differences in the accumulation of deleterious mutations across diverse human populations. 
R. Do et al.
   Differences in demographic history across populations are expected to cause differences in the accumulation of deleterious mutations because natural selection works less efficiently when population sizes are small. Surprisingly, however, the relative burden of deleterious mutations has never been directly measured across human populations on a per-haploid genome basis, despite the fact that this is what matters biologically in the absence of dominance and epistasis. Here we empirically measure the relative accumulation of deleterious mutations in 13 diverse populations (Yoruba, Mandenka, San, Mbuti, Dinka, Australian, French, Sardinian, Han, Dai, Mixe, Karitiana and Papuan) along with one archaic population (Denisova). All the present-day populations have statistically indistinguishable accumulations of coding mutations. We highlight two examples. First, we find no evidence for a lower mutational load in West Africans than in Europeans despite the approximately 30% higher genetic diversity in West Africans: the accumulation of nonsynonymous mutations in West Africans is 1.01±0.02 times that in Europeans, and for “probably damaging” mutations, the ratio is 1.03±0.04. Second, we find no evidence for a lower mutational load in populations that have experienced agriculture-related expansions over the last 10,000 years and those that have not: the ratio in Chinese to Karitiana hunter gatherers from Brazil is 0.99±0.07. We determined that these null results are not an artifact of insensitivity of our method to differences in demographic history. As a positive control, we also analyzed archaic Denisovans who are known to have had a small population size for hundreds of thousands of years since separation from modern humans. We show that the Denisovan lineage has accumulated “probably damaging” mutations 1.33±0.06 times more rapidly than modern humans since they split. These analyses are important because of the new constraints they place on the distribution of selection coefficients in humans. Given the currently estimated demographic histories of West Africans and Europeans, combined with the fact that we do not detect a lower accumulation of deleterious mutations in West Africans than Europeans, we can conclude that only a small proportion of nonsynonymous mutations have selection coefficients in the range s=-0.01 to -0.001, which is the range of selection coefficients which would be expected to show a lower accumulation in West Africans than in Africans.
Deep coverage Bedouin genomes reveal Bedouin haplotypes shared among worldwide populations in the 1000 Genomes Project. 
J. L. Rodriguez-Flores et al.
   The 1000 Genomes Project (1000G) has sampled and sequenced over 2500 genomes that are representative of the genetic diversity in populations worldwide. The Arabian Peninsula has not been previously included in 1000G, hence the connections between genetic variation in the indigenous Bedouin people and worldwide populations is unknown. We have sampled genomes from Bedouin individuals in the nation of Qatar as a window into the genetic variation in this understudied region. Our goal was to use this sample to assess the hypothesis that there is detectable shared ancestry between Bedouin and Southern European populations resulting from the history of empires that spanned both the Mediterranean and Arabian regions and the hypothesis that there is shared ancestry between Bedouin and contemporary Latin American populations, since the majority of European settlers in Latin America from the past half millennia are primarily from Southern European countries. We selected 60 Qataris with over 95% Bedouin ancestry and at least 3 generations of ancestry in Qatar for deep coverage genome sequencing. Genomes were sequenced by the Illumina Genome Network using TruSeq DNA PCR-free sample preparation, generating over 120 gigabases of paired-end 100 base pair reads per genome on a HiSeq 2500, yielding over 30x depth and genotypes for >96% of the genome using both the ELAND/CASAVA and BWA/GATK pipelines. Using these genotypes, we inferred haplotypes using SHAPEIT for Bedouin Qataris and for 1000G populations on a set of sites polymorphic in both 1000G and Bedouins. We used admixture analysis to assess shared ancestry between our Bedouin sample and 1000G populations using the ancestry deconvolution method SUPPORTMIX. Given the lack of appropriate ancestral populations, we conducted a leave-one-out approach, where for each population (1000G + Bedouin = n), we removed the population and used the remaining n-1 populations as an ancestral reference panel. Using this approach, we observed up to 15% Bedouin ancestry in European, South Asian, and American populations. Likewise, we observed ancestry from Europe, South Asia, and America in the Bedouin. For individuals from the Americas, the analysis identified a considerable number of segments shared with Bedouins previously classified as European ancestry. 
Using a haplotype-based model to infer Native American colonization history.
C. Lewis et al.
   We apply a powerful haplotype-based model (described in Lawson et al. 2012) to infer the population history of 410 individuals from ~50 Native American groups, using data interrogated at >470,000 genome-wide autosomal Single-Nucleotide-Polymorphisms (SNPs). The model matches haplotype patterns among individuals' chromosomes to infer which individuals share recent common ancestry at each location of the genome, an approach that has previously been demonstrated to increase power substantially over widely-used alternative approaches that consider SNPs independently. We apply this methodology to 1861 samples described in Reich et al. (2012), incorporating 263 additional samples from 32 relevant world-wide regions collated from other publicly available resources and currently unavailable data. We utilize these methodology and data in two ways. First, we infer intermixing (i.e. "admixture") events among different Native American groups by identifying the groups that share the most haplotype segments. Using additional unpublished techniques, we determine the dates of these intermixing events, the proportions of DNA contributed, and the precise genetic make-up of the groups involved. These unique characteristics set this methodology apart from all presently available software, allowing us to place these mixing events into a clear historical context and thus identify the factors (e.g. the rise or fall of various Native American empires) that have contributed most to the genetic architecture of present-day Native American groups. Second, we match DNA patterns from each Native American group to a set of over 30 populations from Siberia and East Asia, describing each Native American group as a mixture of DNA from these regions. This enables us to shed light on the widely debated number of distinct migrations into the Americas during the initial colonization across the Bering Strait, comparing our results to previous inference from the literature. Our application demonstrates the power gained by using rich haplotype information relative to approaches that ignore this information.
Using Ancient Genomes to Detect Positive Selection on the Human Lineage. 
K. Prüfer et al.
   At least two distinct groups of archaic hominins inhabited Eurasia before the arrival of modern humans: Neandertals and Denisovans. The analysis of the genomes of these archaic humans revealed that they are more closely related to one another than they are to modern humans. However, since modern and archaic humans are so closely related, only about 10% of the archaic DNA sequences fall outside the present-day human variation whereas for 90% of the genome, Neandertal or Denisova DNA sequences are more closely related to some humans than to others. The fact that the archaic sequence often falls within the diversity of modern humans can be used to detect selective sweeps that affected all modern humans after their split from archaic humans since such sweeps will result in genomic regions where both the Neandertal and Denisova genomes fall outside the modern human variation. The genetic lengths of such external regions are proportional to the strength of selection, since stronger selection will lead to faster sweeps allowing less time for recombination to decrease their size. We have implemented a test for such external regions as a hidden Markov model. At each polymorphic position the model emits ancestral or derived based on whether the tested archaic genome carries the ancestral or derived variant of SNPs observed in present-day humans. The model was applied to 185 African genomes from the 1000 genomes phase 1 data. We identified thousands of external regions using the Neandertal and Denisova genomes, separately. Approximately one third of the regions are overlapping between the two genomes. These regions are significantly longer than regions only identified in only one of the archaic genomes. Based on this excess of overlap for long regions, we devise a measure to identify a set of regions that are candidates for selective sweeps on the human lineage since the split from Neandertal and Denisova.
Pulling out the 1%: Whole-Genome In-Solution (WISC) capture for the targeted enrichment of ancient DNA sequencing libraries. 
C. D. Bustamante et al.
   The very low levels of endogenous DNA remaining in most ancient specimens has precluded the shotgun sequencing of many interesting samples due to cost. For example, ancient DNA (aDNA) libraries derived from bones and teeth often contain <1 b="" by="" capacity="" dna.="" dna="" endogenous="" environmental="" is="" majority="" meaning="" of="" sequencing="" taken="" that="" the="" up=""> We will present a method for the targeted enrichment of the endogenous component of human aDNA sequencing libraries. Using biotinylated RNA baits transcribed from genomic DNA libraries, we are able to significantly enrich for human-derived DNA fragments. This approach, which we call whole-genome in-solution capture (WISC), allows us to obtain genome-wide ancestral information from ancient samples with very low endogenous DNA contents. We demonstrate WISC on libraries created from four Iron Age and Bronze Age human teeth from Bulgaria, as well as bone samples from seven Peruvian mummies and a Bronze Age hair sample from Denmark. Prior to capture, shotgun sequencing of these libraries yielded an average of 1.2% of reads mapping to the human genome (including duplicates). After capture, this fraction increased dramatically, with up to 59% of reads mapped to human and folds enrichment ranging from 5X to 139X. Furthermore, we maintained coverage of the majority of fragments present in the pre-capture library. Intersection with the 1000 Genomes Project reference panel yielded an average of 50,723 SNPs (range 3,062-147,243) for the post-capture libraries sequenced with 1 million reads, compared with 13,280 SNPs (range 217-73,266) for the pre-capture libraries, increasing resolution in population genetic analyses. We will also present the results of performing WISC on other aDNA libraries from both archaic human and non-human samples, including ancient domestic dog samples. Our capture approach is flexible and cost-effective, allowing researchers to access aDNA from many specimens that were previously unsuitable for sequencing. Furthermore, this method has applications in other contexts, such as the enrichment of target human DNA in forensic samples.
Insights into population history from a high coverage Neandertal genome. 
D. Reich1, for.the. Neandertal Genome Consortium2 
   We have sequenced to about 50-fold coverage a genome sequence from about 40 mg of a bone found in Denisova Cave in Southern Siberia. The genome of this female is much more closely related to the low-coverage Neandertal genomes from Croatia, Spain, Germany and the Caucasus than to the genome of archaic Denisovans, a sister group of Neandertals, and provides unambiguous evidence that both Neandertals and Denisovans inhabited the Altai Mountains in Siberia. The high-coverage Neandertal genome, combined with our earlier sequencing of a high quality Denisova genome, allows novel insights about the population history of archaic humans:
    •We document recent inbreeding in this Altai Neandertal. The inbreeding coefficient of about 1/8 corresponds to about the homozygosity that would be expected from a mating of half siblings. 
    •The Altai Neandertal genome shares almost seven percent more derived alleles with present-day Africans than does the Denisova genome. This means that the Denisovans derived a proportion of their ancestry from a very archaic human lineage, and the amount of this ancestry they inherit is larger than in Neandertals. 
    • The Denisovan genome is affected by major recent gene flow from an Altai-related Neandertal. 
    • To further characterize the variation among Neandertals we sequenced the genome of a Neandertal from the Caucasus to about 0.5-fold coverage. Comparisons to present-day genomes show that the Neandertals who contributed genes to present-day non-Africans were more closely related to this Caucasian Neandertal than to the Neandertals we sequenced from the Altai. 
    •We built a map of Neandertal ancestry in modern humans, using data from all non-Africans in the 1000 Genomes Project. We show that the average Neandertal ancestry on chromosome X of present-day non-Africans is about a fifth of the genome average. It is known that hybrid incompatibility loci concentrate on chromosome X. Thus, this observation is consistent with a model of hybrid incompatibility in which Neandertal variants that introgressed into modern humans were rapidly selected away due to epistatic interactions with the modern human genetic background.
Inferring complex demographies from PSMC coalescent rate estimates: African substructure and the Out-of-Africa event.
S. Gopalakrishnan et al.
   Human population history is an intriguing and complex story with many events like population growth, bottlenecks, time-dependent/non-homogeneous migration, population splits and mixtures. Estimating complete demographies with population sizes, rates of gene flow and population split times has proven to be a challenging endeavor. We propose a framework for jointly estimating the demography parameters, especially gene-flow rates and split times, for a large number of populations. We use coalescent rate estimates obtained from Pairwise Sequentially Markovian Coalescent (PSMC) as the starting point for our analysis. Since PSMC works on only two chromosomes at a time, we apply PSMC to all pairs of individuals to obtain the pairwise coalescent rates for lineages from every pair of sampled populations. Using a mathematical model for calculating coalescent probabilites given population parameters, we estimate demography using the parameters that best fit the observed coalesecent rates.
   In this study, we focus on two aspects of African population genetics, 1. the nature of population structure in Africa going back in time and 2. the timing of the Out-of-Africa event. To address these questions, we assembled a dataset with whole genome sequences from 162 individuals using both in-house sequencing and publicly available sources. These samples span 22 populations worldwide. These include eleven African populations which we use to dissect the population substructure in Africa. In addition, we also have 2 Middle Eastern, 5 European and 4 East/Central Asian populations which inform the population split time estimates for the Out-of-Africa event and the European-Asian split.
   We find extensive population structure in Africa extending back to before the Out-of-Africa event. The Ethiopian populations, Amhara and Oromo, show evidence of mixing beyond 15 kya. The Maasai and Luhye merge with the Ethiopian populations to form a panmictic East African population ~40kya. We find evidence for extensive mixing between east and west African populations before 50kya. Among the pygmy populations, we see recent gene flow between the Batwa and Mbuti. All African populations except the San merge into a single population around 110 kya. The San exchange migrants with the other African populations beginning ~120 kya. We estimate the Out-of-Africa event to have occurred ~75kya and the European-Asian split to ~25kya.
Out of Africa, which way? 
L. Pagani et al.
While the African origin of all modern human populations is well-established, the dynamics of the diaspora that led anatomically modern humans to colonize the lands outside Africa are still under debate. Understanding the demographic parameters as well as the route (or routes) followed by the ancestors of all non-Africans could help to refine our understanding of the selection processes that occurred subsequently, as well as shedding light on a landmark process in our evolutionary history. Of the three possible gateways out of Africa (via Morocco across the Gibraltar strait, via Egypt through the Suez isthmus or via the Horn of Africa across Bab el Mandeb strait) only the latter two are supported by paleoclimatic and archaeological evidence. Furthermore, recent studies (Pagani et al. 2012) showed that, although the modern Ethiopian populations might be good candidates for the descendants of the source population of such a migration, modern Egyptians could be an even better candidate. Unfortunately, however, only a few Egyptian samples have been genotyped and, as yet, none have been fully sequenced. Here, we have generated 125 Ethiopian and 100 Egyptian whole genome sequences (Illumina HiSeq, 8x average depth). The genomes were partitioned using PCAdmix (Brisbin et al. 2012) to account for the confounding effects of recent introgression from neighboring non-African populations. To explore the genetic legacy of migration routes out of Africa, and in particular to test whether the observed genetic data support one route over another, the African components of Egyptians and Ethiopians were then compared to a panel of available non-African populations from the 1000 Genomes Project (1000 Genomes Project Consortium, 2012). The high resolution provided by whole genome sequencing allows us to shed new light on the paths followed by our ancestors as they left Africa, as well as refining the current knowledge of the demographic history of the populations analyzed.
The Saudi Arabian Genome Reveals a Two Step Out-of-Africa Migration. 
J. J. Farrell et al.
   Here we present the first high-coverage whole genome sequences from a Middle Eastern population consisting of 14 Eastern Province Saudi Arabians. Genomes from this region are of interest to further answer questions regarding “Out-of-Africa” human migration. Applying a pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent model (PSMC), we inferred the history of population sizes between 10,000 years and 1,000,000 years before present (YBP) for the Saudi genomes and an additional 11 high-coverage whole genome sequences from Africa, Asia and Europe.
   The model estimated the initial separation from Africans at approximately 110,000 YBP. This intermediate population then underwent a long period of decreasing population size culminating in a bottleneck 50,000 YBP followed by an expansion into Asia and Europe. The split and subsequent bottleneck were thus two distinct events separated by a long intermediate period of genetic drift in the Middle East. The two most frequent mitochondria haplogroups (30% each) were the Middle Eastern U7a and the African L. The presence of the L haplogroup common in Africa was unexpected given the clustering of the Saudis with Europeans in the phylogenetic tree and suggests some recent African admixture. To examine this further, we performed formal tests for a history of admixture and found no evidence of African admixture in the Saudi after the split. Taken together, these analyses suggest that the L3 haplogroup found in the Saudi were present before the bottleneck 50,000 YBP. Given the TMRCA estimates for the L3 haplogroup of approximately 70,000 YBP and the timing of the Out-of-Africa split, these analyses suggest that L3 haplogroup arose in the Middle East with a subsequent back migration and expansion into Africa over the Horn-of-Africa during the lower sea levels found during the glacial period bottleneck.
    These results are consistent with the hypothesis that modern humans populated the Middle East before a split 110,000 YBP, underwent genetic drift for 60,000 years before expanding to Asia and Europe as well as back-migration into Africa. Examination of genetic variants discovered by Saudi whole genome sequencing in ancestral African populations and European/Asian populations will contribute to the understanding human migration patterns and the origin of genetic variation in modern humans.
 Geographic Population Structure (GPS) of worldwide human populations infers biogeographical origin down to home village
E. Elhaik et al.
The search for a method that utilizes biological information to predict human’s place of origin has occupied scientists for millennia. Modern biogeography methods are accurate to 700 km in Europe but are highly inaccurate elsewhere, particularly in Southeast Asia and Oceania. The accuracy of these methods is bound by the choice of genotyping arrays, the size and quality of the reference dataset, and principal component (PC)-based algorithms. To overcome the first two obstacles, we designed GenoChip, a dedicated genotyping array for genetic anthropology with an unprecedented number of ~12,000 Y-chromosomal and ~3,300 mtDNA SNPs and over 130,000 autosomal and X-chromosomal SNPs carefully chosen to study ancestry without any known health, medical, or phenotypic relevance. We also 615 individuals from 54 worldwide populations collected as part of the Genographic Project and the 1000 Genomes Project. To overcome the last impediment, we developed an admixture-based Geographic Population Structure (GPS) method that infers the biogeography of worldwide individuals down to their village of origin. GPS’s accuracy was demonstrated on three data sets: worldwide populations, Southeast Asians and Oceanians, and Sardinians (Italy) using 40,000-130,000 GenoChip markers. GPS correctly placed 80%; of worldwide individuals within their country of origin with an accuracy of 87%; for Asians and Oceanians. Applied to over 200 Sardinians villagers of both sexes, GPS placed a quarter of them within their villages and most of the remaining within 50 km of their villages, allowing us to identify the demographic processes that shaped the Sardinian society. These findings are significantly more accurate than PCA-based approaches. We further demonstrate two GPS applications in tracing the poorly understood biogeographical origin of the Druze and North American (CEU) populations. Our findings demonstrate the potential of the GenoChip array for genetic anthropology. Moreover, the accuracy and power of GPS underscore the promise of admixture-based methods to biogeography and has important ramifications for genetic ancestry testing, forensic and medical sciences, and genetic privacy.

30 comments:

Grognard said...

All right, here is an example to show why it's important to know what the idea of drift is and selection or you won't even know what some studies are really saying and how you can discount many of them out of hand.

It's just impossible to go from an effective population size to an actual population size, even if you could calculate that out. So "a few dozen" neanderthal could really mean a few dozen entire ethnic groups of neanderthal!

Further, again talking about drift THERE IS NO WAY A SINGLE INTROGRESSION WILL SURVIVE IN A SMALL POPULATION! When you have a small population and high drift you exclude the vast, vast majority of changes and introgressions.

That's why virtually every animal or crop bred by humans is highly inbred as possible, your biggest challenge is to keep all the random crap you don't want out while propagating on the one or two features you absolutely have to have.

So you would have the whole tribe essentially become neanderthal or have zero effect from the introgression in a very small tribe, with a very heavy bias towards the latter.

The bantu one has some funny ideas as well but I won't go into it.

The middle east segregation could easily go the other way.

WISC results seem exciting, can't wait for those.

אחיקם גדליהו ישעיהו בן הלל said...

No indication of Khazar genetic ancestry among Ashkenazi Jews. M. Metspalu1,13,14, D. M. Behar2,1,14, Y. Baran3, S. Rosset4, N. Kopelman5, B. Yunusbayev1,6, A. Gladstein7, M. F. Hammer7, S. Tzur2, E. Halperin3,8,9, K. Skorecki2,10, R. Villems1,11, N. A. Rosenberg12 1) Evolutionary Biology, Estonian Biocentre & Tartu Univ, Tartu, Estonia; 2) Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 31096, Israel; 3) The Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel; 4) Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; 5) Porter School of Environmental Studies, Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; 6) Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa 450054, Russia; 7) ARL Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA; 8) Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, George Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel; 9) International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California 94704, USA; 10) Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 31096, Israel; 11) Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tallinn 10130, Estonia; 12) Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA; 13) Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, 94720, USA; 14) these authors contributed equally.


"The origin and history of the Ashkenazi Jewish population have long been of great interest. Most studies have concluded that the population derives its genetic ancestry from both Europe and the Middle East, and that it retains high genetic similarity to other Jewish groups such as the Sephardi Jews in Europe and Jewish communities in Northern Africa. It has recently been claimed, however, that a large part of the ancestry of the Ashkenazi population originates with the Khazars, a conglomerate of multi-ethnic, mostly Turkic-speaking tribes who consolidated into a powerful state just north of the Caucasus mountains between ca. 1,400 to 1,000 years ago. It has been difficult to explicitly test for Khazar contributions into Ashkenazi Jews, because it is not clear which extant populations can be used to represent modern descendants of the Khazars, and because the proximity of the southern Caucasus region to the Middle East makes it difficult to attribute any potential signal of Caucasus ancestry to Khazars rather than Middle Eastern populations. Here, we assemble the largest sample set available to date for assessment of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic origins, containing genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism data in 1,774 samples from 107 Jewish and non-Jewish populations that span the possible regions of potential Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry: Europe, the Middle East, and 15 populations from the region historically associated with the Khazar kingdom at its peak. Employing a variety of standard techniques for the analysis of population structure, we find that Ashkenazi Jewish samples share the greatest genetic ancestry with other Jewish populations, and among non-Jewish populations, with groups from Mediterranean Europe and the Middle East, and that they have no particular signal of genetic sharing with populations from the Caucasus. Thus, analysis of the most comprehensive set of Jewish and other Middle Eastern and European populations together with a large sample from the region of the Khazar kingdom does not support the hypothesis of a significant contribution of the elusive Khazars into the gene pool of the Ashkenazi Jews."

terryt said...

Really interesting papers coming up. Dienekes will be excited about 'The Saudi Arabian Genome Reveals a Two Step Out-of-Africa Migration'.

Quote:

"The model estimated the initial separation from Africans at approximately 110,000 YBP. This intermediate population then underwent a long period of decreasing population size culminating in a bottleneck 50,000 YBP followed by an expansion into Asia and Europe".

That actually explains almost everything. Both mt-DNA M and N have a series of mutations before they expand from where-ever it was they developed.

Unfortunately 'Out of Africa, which way?' doesn't actually tell us the answer. We'll have to wait. Other interesting snippets:

"Our study strongly supports the West Eurasian and East Asian route of migration and settlement of early Burmese population".

East Asian route? Through Central Asia?

"Surprisingly, we also show that western Austronesian-speaking populations have inherited substantial proportions of their Asian ancestry from a source that falls within the variation of present-day Austro-Asiatic populations in Southeast Asia".

I wonder why they don't consider teh possibility of an earlier Austro-Asiatic substrate population in Western Indonesia. I understood that was generally accepted.

"Comparisons to present-day genomes show that the Neandertals who contributed genes to present-day non-Africans were more closely related to this Caucasian Neandertal than to the Neandertals we sequenced from the Altai".

That makes complete sense. Modern humans must have reached the Caucasus region before expanding further, leaving Y-DNA G, F3 and IJ behind as they moved east. The mt-DNA haplogroups X, N1'5, N2 and N3 may also have originated somewhere on the Iranian Plateau, perhaps near the Caucasus.

Davidski said...

I've seen the results for one of the Iron Age Bulgarian samples and the Bronze Age Danish sample. They're not as detailed as I had hoped but still interesting.

Onur said...

No indication of Khazar genetic ancestry among Ashkenazi Jews.

The origin and history of the Ashkenazi Jewish population have long been of great interest. Most studies have concluded that the population derives its genetic ancestry from both Europe and the Middle East, and that it retains high genetic similarity to other Jewish groups such as the Sephardi Jews in Europe and Jewish communities in Northern Africa. It has recently been claimed, however, that a large part of the ancestry of the Ashkenazi population originates with the Khazars, a conglomerate of multi-ethnic, mostly Turkic-speaking tribes who consolidated into a powerful state just north of the Caucasus mountains between ca. 1,400 to 1,000 years ago. It has been difficult to explicitly test for Khazar contributions into Ashkenazi Jews, because it is not clear which extant populations can be used to represent modern descendants of the Khazars, and because the proximity of the southern Caucasus region to the Middle East makes it difficult to attribute any potential signal of Caucasus ancestry to Khazars rather than Middle Eastern populations. Here, we assemble the largest sample set available to date for assessment of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic origins, containing genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism data in 1,774 samples from 107 Jewish and non-Jewish populations that span the possible regions of potential Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry: Europe, the Middle East, and 15 populations from the region historically associated with the Khazar kingdom at its peak. Employing a variety of standard techniques for the analysis of population structure, we find that Ashkenazi Jewish samples share the greatest genetic ancestry with other Jewish populations, and among non-Jewish populations, with groups from Mediterranean Europe and the Middle East, and that they have no particular signal of genetic sharing with populations from the Caucasus. Thus, analysis of the most comprehensive set of Jewish and other Middle Eastern and European populations together with a large sample from the region of the Khazar kingdom does not support the hypothesis of a significant contribution of the elusive Khazars into the gene pool of the Ashkenazi Jews.

Justin said...

Last one is pretty bad-ass!

G Horvat said...

"Q-M3 is mostly found in Yeniseian...". This is news to me. In fact, I wonder if it is even correct.

pconroy said...

My father has a relative who is mtDNA F1a1c/R1b-L21 - so I guess this means that they are related to Vietnam possibly?

My mother's Kazakh relative (predicted 4th cousin) is R9b1b/C3c, and male line descendant of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edigu

It seems that Edigu founded the Nogai Horde - which would be based near the North East Caucasus. My mother has previously been shown to have about 4% Lezgin (as am I)...

AWood said...

It's frustrating to keep seeing this stated. The Khazars were not from the Caucasus for pete's sake, they were a North Euro/East Asian hybrid population. Nonetheless, I agree that very minimal contribution from the Khazars is in the Ashkenazi gene pool. K1a1b1a, for instance was not a woman from the Caucasus.

terryt said...

"'Q-M3 is mostly found in Yeniseian...'. This is news to me. In fact, I wonder if it is even correct".

According to information I have managed to collect over the years it is not correct. Yeniseian Q is mostly (if not entirely) the related Q-L54 derived Q-L330.

"Last one is pretty bad-ass!'

Yes. It is pretty much supports what Dienekes has been proposing for some time.

mousterian said...

D,

How much significance would you attach to the Saudi genome paper? This almost seems to match too closely with the Nubian Complex expansion in early MIS 5, followed by a subsequent spread into the Levant during the early MIS 3 Arabian pluvial.

Is it time to get out the cigars? Have we reached a "genetics" tipping point to forever put "Coasting out of Africa" to rest?

Jeff

Dienekes said...

@mousterian,

It's hard to tell without knowing the details. What does seem to be the case is that a lot of papers came up with African-Eurasian split of ~50k using the old "fast" autosomal mutation rate, and these dates are doubled using the newer directly measured "slower" rates.

Onur said...

Conroy,

I know that it sounds boring to you, but you are just an ordinary Irish. Just come to terms with it.

terryt said...

"Is it time to get out the cigars? Have we reached a 'genetics' tipping point to forever put 'Coasting out of Africa' to rest?"

I have never, even for a moment, been at all persuaded of the coastal migration idea. There are far too many problems with the theory for it to be correct.

Grognard said...

We already have dna from khazarian royal burial mounds and it matches up to some living jewish americans.

That study is just comparing a random modern population to another random modern population and then declaring they have nothing to do with each other, completely pointless.

Anyway it's obvious not all or even most ashkenzi jews are khazarians but it seems like some people have a serious wish to blot out reality for political reasons which don't even make much sense. In the uprisings in poland-lithuania the most likely jewish khazarian remnants were largely wiped out. It's not for nothing that in much of eastern europe they associate red hair with jewish blood, though I am not sure it would really exist much in ukraine or lithuania any more. but clearly the american jewish people are also a different subset than what is called ashkenazi as a blanket term these days. They much more heavily come from the rheinland where it's said many settled right after the fall of khazaria, and they have much higher IQs on average than jews living abroad.

eurologist said...

Sorry,

but that Saudi paper is just all-over-the-place. While the ooA timing is almost right, there is no way modern humans expanded as recently as 50,000 ya (i.e., much after the likely settlement of Sundaland and almost concomitant with expansion to the Levant and Europe).

The L3 comment is interesting at best - but not likely given the data reported.

Finally, I have yet to see any archaeological or genetic evidence that AMHs stayed/ survived west of eastern Pakistan ~50,000 ya or before.

andrew said...

"Our study strongly supports the West Eurasian and East Asian route of migration and settlement of early Burmese population".

I have no idea what this means.

mousterian said...

Arguing purely from the archaeological perspective, I see strong evidence for a link between the lithic technologies of Arabia >50 ka BP and that which appears in the Levant around 50 ka BP (i.e., the Emiran Industry). This emerging picture of L3 in the Arabian Peninsula prior to the Eurasian split is corroborated by the sudden introduction of preferential bidirectional point production syststems at sites like Boker Tachtit and Ain Difla in the arid margins of the Levant.

Going east into Asia? All bets are off. There is NOTHING to suggest a cultural connection between South Asia and the Middle East, other than Blinkhorn et al.'s recent paper reporting (possible) Nubian Complex cores in Rajastan.

Going west back into Africa? Yup, Relatively late Nubian Compex site at ~55 ka BP found around Lake Victoria a few months ago, not to mention Nubian assemblages found at K'One 5, Hargeisa, and Gorgora. Now, for someone to go back and determine the ages for these sites...

Blender said...

Grognard,
I would really appreciate a reference for the results of the khazarian royal burial mounds. It would be kind of strange that a serious ancient DNA study goes almost unnoticed.
Of course, if it not published in a peer reviewed journal, it is just some dude's claim, i.e., not even worth to mention.

Thanks

Kepler said...

About the paper by Martínez Cruzado, I wonder: did they consider the fact that from around 1500 and at least for several decades the Spaniards (and some others) made slaves all along the Venezuelan coast and took those slaves to the first Spanish colonies in Puerto Rico, Hispaniola (currently Dominican Republic) etc? The practice was made illegal but it continued nonetheless. Alone the German Welser merchants were responsible for sending several thousand slaves from their base in Coro, Venezuela. There were other groups of Europeans based in Cubagua who made constant raids to the mainland and then took thousands of slaves to those islands. The native American population in the islands was collapsing, so a lot of human trafficking took place to replace the slaves until the trade with Africans started to pick up.

Annie Mouse said...

"suggest that the L3 haplogroup found in the Saudi were present before the bottleneck 50,000 YBP"

From the phraseology, it sounds to me that the authors are not suggesting ALL of L3, but part of it.

Which is I think no change from the previous thought on L3.

terryt said...

"I have no idea what this means [Our study strongly supports the West Eurasian and East Asian route of migration and settlement of early Burmese population]".

Surely it can only mean that the authors see two distinct routes into Burma. Presumably one from Southy Asia and one from East Asia.

mregdna said...

How is it possible to claim results about the Khazars without knowing exactly who were the Khazars?
The fact that Khazars were described by some authors as red hair people seems to point a kind of Iranian or Tocharian origin rather than a altaic turk one's.
Also it seems that many tribes confederate and assimilated different ethnies including some caucasians.

PF said...

"We already have dna from khazarian royal burial mounds and it matches up to some living jewish americans."

Grognord, I too would like to see the reference to Ancient DNA testing of Khazarian burial mounds. Can't find anything like that on Google Scholar, so please do share.

I don't quite understand this whole Khazarian-Ashkenazi hullabaloo. If the Khazar elite did in fact contribute to the contemporary Ashkenazi genome, it couldn't possibly be much. It's obvious that Ashkenazi are overwhelmingly Greco-Roman, with lesser but significant contributions from an original Levantine population and much later local European populations. Who cares if a little Khazar snuck in there? The implication that this somehow relates to modern Jews' claim to Israel is absurd...

"clearly the american jewish people are also a different subset than what is called ashkenazi as a blanket term these days. They much more heavily come from the rheinland where it's said many settled right after the fall of khazaria, and they have much higher IQs on average than jews living abroad."

Again, any evidence? Established historical scholarship indicates a migration from Italy to the Rhineland a millennium ago which corresponds with genetic studies. And American Jews different from Ashkenazi living abroad -- LOL!

pconroy said...

@Onur,

The point of my post was, since I'm Irish, with no recent admixture - how do you explain my strange "relatives"?

The segments I share with people from the Caucasus and Ukraine (11cM) must represent some ancient sharing, and give some clues to the possible route Neolithic, Iron-Age or Indo-Europeans took to reach Ireland...

Onur said...

The point of my post was, since I'm Irish, with no recent admixture - how do you explain my strange "relatives"?

The segments I share with people from the Caucasus and Ukraine (11cM) must represent some ancient sharing, and give some clues to the possible route Neolithic, Iron-Age or Indo-Europeans took to reach Ireland...


What do Caucasians and Ukrainians have to do with the Vietnamese?

eurologist said...

Re J. J. Farrell et al.:

It makes no sense that the ~60,000 years of drift actually took place in Saudi Arabia (SA):

- SA would not have supported a sufficiently large population during much of that time

- Apart from L3, SA is not host of a wide range of particularly old uniparental haplogroups - they are in fact found in South and Southeast Asia.

- mtDNA M and N are almost perfectly sorted, geographically. Almost impossible if SA was the distribution center.

- If SA clusters with Europe, then why do they have such vastly different uniparental markers? The only possible answer is that during back-migration from India/Pakistan, each received an autosomally similar group, but with a different subset of uniparental markers. In SA they perhaps mixed with some surviving group, and Europe had later admixture from Siberia and the Middle East - altogether still keeping it closer to SA than to Asia proper (I am assuming they used East Asia, here).

Could it be that Saudis now are closer to that population expanding 50,000 ya than other extant populations? Of course, they likely have less admixture from other populations - especially if it is true that they have no African admixture (which differs from other analyses I have seen). Asia and Europe remained in contact, Europe and parts of the Middle East remained in contact, Europe, the Middle East, and India remained in contact, etc.

Annie Mouse said...

@PCconroy

I doubt your Ukrainian or Caucasus relatives are particularly ancient. I dont think identifiable segments would last that long. Irish soldiers used to hire out to foreign governments regularly, all across Europe. Wild geese they were called, and then there are the refugees travelling away from the wars. At times Ireland was considered very cosmopolitan.

I have one Greek relative with a big segment who I think is a descendant of a soldier cousin from the first world war. I actually know of one distant uncle who was in that part of Greeece in WWI. The Greek relative swears he is entirely greek with some caucasus. But appears he has only tracked his male relatives. Apparently any genetic line that passes through a woman does not count.

terryt said...

"It makes no sense that the ~60,000 years of drift actually took place in Saudi Arabia (SA)"

I wouldn't expect '~60,000 years of drift' in Arabia but we do see evidence of at least a period of drift before mt-DNAs M and N expanded beyong Arabia in the string of mutations at the base of each haplogroup.

"SA would not have supported a sufficiently large population during much of that time"

That would explain the apparent lack of immediate expansion on leaving Africa. The population in Arabia was of limited size for some time.

"mtDNA M and N are almost perfectly sorted, geographically. Almost impossible if SA was the distribution center".

But it makes complete sense if we consider the possibility that M and N took separate and distinct routes east. I have long assumed the distribution indicates exactly that. The two haplogroups did not expand together.

stephen said...

I noted the assumption that the population of Denisovans was relatively low. But the Denisovans and others could have been in coastal regions and islands which were inundated at the end of the Glacial Maximum. We'd have to be scanning the ocean floor for Denisovans and others.