May 19, 2009

More on prehistoric South Siberians (Keyser et al. 2009)

This seems like a compendium of these authors' previous work (see here and links therein) which had appeared in forensic journals so far; there seems to be more material in this paper than in the previous shorter papers, but as far as I can tell, no new genetic results.

There is also supplementary data in the article.

From the paper:
The additional analysis performed on Xiongnu specimens revealed that whereas none of the specimens from the Egyin Gol valley bore this haplogroup, the Scytho-Siberian skeleton from the Sebÿstei site exhibited R1a1 haplogroup.
A previous study on Egyin Gol from Mongolia by Keyser et al.

More from the paper:
A search in the YHRD database as well as in our own databank revealed that none of the Y-STR haplotypes obtained from the south Siberian samples perfectly matched (at 17 loci) those included in the databases. Nevertheless, when not all loci were scored, matches were found for all samples except two (S07 and S32) for which even the search based on the 9-loci minimal haplotype was fruitless (Table 4).
The article includes fairly comprehensive searches of the discovered Y-chromosome and mtDNA types in modern populations.

The mtDNA results:
Twenty samples were found to belong to west Eurasian haplogroups (U2, U4,
U5a1, T1, T3, T4, H5a, H6, HV, K, and I), whereas the 6 remaining samples were attributed to east Eurasian haplogroups (Z, G2a, C, F1b and N9a).
Interestingly:
Moreover, it is likely that some mtDNA lineages were carried to southern Siberia from the Volga–Ural region. Incidentally, in the fifth century BC, Herodotus mentioned transit trade occurring in Central Asia along a route that stretched from the Urals in the west to the Altai and the Minusinsk Basin in the east (Hemphill and Mallory 2004). In Altai, the presence of the R1a1 haplogroup in the middle of the fifth century BC is confirmed by the sample SEB 96K2 of Ricaut et al. (2004) which was found to belong to this Y-haplogroup. The boundary of the eastern European influence seems to be fixed at the peri-Baikal area since no R1a1 haplogroup was found in the Xiongnu specimens of the Northern border of Mongolia.
Link to Ricaut et al. (2004). This is in good agreement with the anthropological picture by Alexeev:
"The boundary of the Europeoid movement is clearly fixed at Lake Baikal. To the east of Baikal no palaeoanthropological find bears any traces of Europeoid admixture."
See also my compendium on ancient Y-chromosome studies.

Human Genetics doi:10.1007/s00439-009-0683-0

Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people.

Keyser C. et al.

Abstract

To help unravel some of the early Eurasian steppe migration movements, we determined the Y-chromosomal and mitochondrial haplotypes and haplogroups of 26 ancient human specimens from the Krasnoyarsk area dated from between the middle of the second millennium BC. to the fourth century AD. In order to go further in the search of the geographic origin and physical traits of these south Siberian specimens, we also typed phenotype-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms. Our autosomal, Y-chromosomal and mitochondrial DNA analyses reveal that whereas few specimens seem to be related matrilineally or patrilineally, nearly all subjects belong to haplogroup R1a1-M17 which is thought to mark the eastward migration of the early Indo-Europeans. Our results also confirm that at the Bronze and Iron Ages, south Siberia was a region of overwhelmingly predominant European settlement, suggesting an eastward migration of Kurgan people across the Russo-Kazakh steppe. Finally, our data indicate that at the Bronze and Iron Age timeframe, south Siberians were blue (or green)-eyed, fair-skinned and light-haired people and that they might have played a role in the early development of the Tarim Basin civilization. To the best of our knowledge, no equivalent molecular analysis has been undertaken so far.

Link

6 comments:

pconroy said...

Can anyone with access to the data, tell me what SNP's are used to define mtDNA T1 here.

As I am T1a and wondering if it's T1a or T1b??

argiedude said...

"A search in the YHRD database as well as in our own databank revealed that none of the Y-STR haplotypes obtained from the south Siberian samples perfectly matched (at 17 loci) those included in the databases."

"for two samples even the search based on the 9-loci minimal haplotype was fruitless."

How odd, since these remains are much closer to the MCRA and should thus be much more homogeneous and modal-ish than current R1a samples.

................

Can someone put together all the ancient R1a haplotype results? In a pdf, xls, txt, anything.

Dienekes said...

How odd, since these remains are much closer to the MCRA and should thus be much more homogeneous and modal-ish than current R1a samples.

That is inaccurate. Old Y-chromosomes within a haplogroup are not necessarily descended from the MRCA of present-day Y-chromosomes within that haplogroup. Indeed, the older we go back in time, the smaller the chance that they are descended from the MRCA.

n/a said...

Some related findings from physical anthropology.

argiedude said...

Virtually all R1a today seems to trace back to the founding lineage of 5,000 ya. That means that before the most succesful clade of R1a arose, haplogroup R1a must have been very limited, in geography and/or frequency, such that today we can hardly find any traces of members of R1a who might belong to a clade ancestral to the super-succesful R1a clade that was born 5,000 years ago.

Dienekes said...

argiedude, I suggest that you read this. The bulk of chromosomes within a lineage may have a relatively recent common ancestry, but there may be outliers which coalesce a much earlier ancestor.

For the case of R1a1 this indicates the presence of R1a1 haplotypes in India that are very removed from what is "typical" for that haplogroup.