I can think of at least three reasons for the more negative outcomes of adopted children: (i) negative early pre-adoption experiences, (ii) relatively negative genetic background of children put up for adoption compared to the general population, or (iii) genetic discordance between parents and adopted children that make their relationship more difficult.
Evolution and Human Behavior doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.01.001
Differential parental investment in families with both adopted and genetic children
Kyle Gibson
Abstract
Stepchildren are abused, neglected and murdered at higher rates than those who live with two genetically related parents. Daly and Wilson used kin selection theory to explain this finding and labeled the phenomenon “discriminative parental solicitude.” I examined discriminative parental solicitude in American households composed of both genetic and unrelated adopted children. In these families, kin selection predicts parents should favor their genetic children over adoptees. Rather than looking at cases of abuse, neglect, homicide and other antisocial behavior, I focused on the positive investments parents made in their children as well as the outcomes of each child. The results show that parents invested more in adopted children than in genetically related ones, especially in educational and personal areas. At the same time, adoptees experienced more negative outcomes. They were more likely to have been arrested, to have been on public assistance and to require treatment for drug, alcohol or mental health issues. They also completed fewer years of schooling and were more likely to divorce. In adoptive families, it appears that “the squeaky wheel gets the grease.” Parents invest more in adoptees not because they favor them, but because they are more likely than genetic children to need the help. I conclude that discriminative parental solicitude differs in adoptive and step households because adoptive families generally result from prolonged parenting effort, not mating effort like stepfamilies.
Link
1 comment:
This work is licensed under a Original Pasture Authorisation. You may refer, reiterate, or procreate articles on this parcel for non-commercial purposes, provided that you attribute them to Dienekes Pontikos and cater a linkup either to the primary attender of this journal or to the singular diary message you are referring to.
--------------------------
ruthallen
Post a Comment