tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post4043628177985776838..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: mtDNA of Tatars from Volga-Ural region (Malyarchuk et al. 2010)Dienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-91894454396007837632010-05-14T19:52:28.021+03:002010-05-14T19:52:28.021+03:00Off topic, but i enjoyed your comment on Mediaite ...<i>Off topic, but i enjoyed your comment on Mediaite on the article by Caleb Howe about the egregious d-bag Roger E. </i><br /><br />I have no idea what either Mediaite or Roger E. are.Dienekeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-73222669790554092712010-05-14T09:08:20.983+03:002010-05-14T09:08:20.983+03:00Off topic, but i enjoyed your comment on Mediaite ...Off topic, but i enjoyed your comment on Mediaite on the article by Caleb Howe about the egregious d-bag Roger E. <br /><br />Also off-topic, but Kazan-native Lenin or Vladimir Ulyanov was a one-quarter Tatar, one-quarter Jew, one-quarter Volga German, and one-quarter Russian. <br /><br />HBD gone terribly wrong, I guess. If Arthur Koestler was correct about the Turkic Khazars being the 13th tribe, Ulyanov would be half-Turkic.dave in bocahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10164227301361227792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-88286602158275529462010-05-13T23:08:14.064+03:002010-05-13T23:08:14.064+03:00Actually, the Y-DNA of nearly all present-day Tata...Actually, the Y-DNA of nearly all present-day Tatars belongs to typically Caucasoid haplogroups. If anything, the Kazan Tatars seem to be differentiated from their Slavic and Finno-Ugric neighbors by exhibiting a greater affinity in their Y-DNA with Caucasian or Near Eastern populations:<br /><br />Kazan Tatar (Wells et al. 2001)<br />1/38 = 2.6% E-M96<br />5/38 = 13.2% F-M89(xH1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9)<br />7/38 = 18.4% I-M170<br />4/38 = 10.5% J2-M172<br />3/38 = 7.9% K-M9(xL-M20, N1c-M46, O-M175, P-M45)<br />1/38 = 2.6% L-M20<br />5/38 = 13.2% N1c-M46<br />2/38 = 5.3% P-M45(xQ1a1-M120, Q1a3a-M3, R1-M173, R2-M124)<br />1/38 = 2.6% R1-M173(xR1a1a-M17)<br />9/38 = 23.7% R1a1a-M17(xR1a1a3-M87)<br /><br />Tatar/Urumqi area, NE Xinjiang (Shou et al. 2010)<br />11/33 = 33.3% I-M170<br />2/33 = 6.1% O3a3c-M134<br />20/33 = 60.6% R1a1a-M17<br /><br />Note the frequency of F-M89(xH1-M52, I-M170, J2-M172, K-M9), which is probably G-M201 and/or J1-M267, and J2-M172 in the Kazan Tatar sample of Wells et al. 2001. Furthermore, one of the Kazan Tatars in this sample has been placed in haplogroup L-M20, which also suggests some degree of affinity with populations of the Caucasus, the Near East, and southern Central Asia.Ebizurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16925110639823856429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-32814392510669549712010-05-13T14:26:37.038+03:002010-05-13T14:26:37.038+03:00Could this be similar to Colombia, where the popul...Could this be similar to Colombia, where the population is mostly Amerindian on the female said and mostly Spanish on the male side? For centuries, Tatars raided Eastern Europe for women.Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05676167615981895061noreply@blogger.com