tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post2319240313973861765..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: East Asian- and African-shift of West Asian/European populationsDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-69709385642837032372012-05-22T18:29:28.264+03:002012-05-22T18:29:28.264+03:00A lot of strong but baseless assertions from the c...A lot of strong but baseless assertions from the commenters of this thread. Is it so easy to get your comments published in this blog?Onur Dincerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05041378853428912894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-78920743822650241072011-05-16T18:21:58.122+03:002011-05-16T18:21:58.122+03:00mr dienekes
I think that kongoid and mongoloid adm...mr dienekes<br />I think that kongoid and mongoloid admixture in the caucasoid groups obeys to a geographical pattern rather than ethnolinguistic one.<br />i.e as far as we go eastwards(in the caucasoid groups' realm)the mongoloid gradient increases and as far as we go southward the kongoid gradient increases.<br />Thus it looks that the mongoloid input in anatolians is very likely a legacy of a very ancient mongoloid-affinity and not be the result of the few turk warriors' invasion.<br />And that's why indo-iranian india and iran have more mongoloid input than anatolia i.e simply because they are located more eastward(closer geographically to Siberia and Eastern Asian than Anatolia)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com