tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post1244912185954030287..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: Best overall matching in EuropeansDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-81057643808450496772009-01-25T06:11:00.000+02:002009-01-25T06:11:00.000+02:00Dienekes, thanks a lot for the explanation. It mak...Dienekes, thanks a lot for the explanation. It makes sense. Though, have the authors of the study calculated this relateness in a similar manner or in a different way? If the latter, could you briefly explain how or copy paste from the study itself?AXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06393617882041446484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-78716280311931845242009-01-25T00:29:00.000+02:002009-01-25T00:29:00.000+02:00Dienekes, will you post your intended Oroqen-Bantu...<I>Dienekes, will you post your intended Oroqen-Bantu comparison post in the future or at least describe its methodology?</I><BR/><BR/>The sample consisted of 10K SNPs, basically every 65th one from the raw data file. The comparison was between Oroqen and one of the Bantu groups, which I don't recall. The score function was 0 for both alleles different, 0.5 for one allele the same, 1 for both alleles the same.<BR/><BR/>It was just something I did on the fly to see for myself, so I don't plan to post on it soon.Dienekeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-48259430466696330312009-01-24T22:47:00.000+02:002009-01-24T22:47:00.000+02:00Dienekes, will you post your intended Oroqen-Bantu...Dienekes, will you post your intended Oroqen-Bantu comparison post in the future or at least describe its methodology?AXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06393617882041446484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-19832595402488004752009-01-24T11:03:00.000+02:002009-01-24T11:03:00.000+02:00I gotta say, some of these results are very curiou...I gotta say, some of these results are very curious. But often there are patterns to them, and sometimes they go both ways. Denmark and Norway...<BR/><BR/>1. Denmark - 42.61%<BR/>2. Poland - 15.39%<BR/>3. North Germany - 11.71%<BR/>4. Holland - 11.65%<BR/>5. Italy (Marche) - 10.26%<BR/>6. Norway - 4.81%<BR/>7. South Germany - 3.56%<BR/><BR/>1. Norway - 36.9%<BR/>2. Poland - 19.64%<BR/>3. Italy (Marche) - 14.76%<BR/>4. North Germany - 12.16%<BR/>5. Sweden - 12.16%<BR/>6. South Germany - 3.46%<BR/>7. Holland - 2.6%Polakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08791738703122670119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-22057747590051944312009-01-23T18:20:00.000+02:002009-01-23T18:20:00.000+02:00Results for Finland...1. Finland - 90.37%2. Poland...Results for Finland...<BR/><BR/>1. Finland - 90.37%<BR/>2. Poland - 6.68% <BR/>3. Norway - 2.08%<BR/>4. North Germany - 0.87%Polakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08791738703122670119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-80854083747345301662009-01-23T15:42:00.000+02:002009-01-23T15:42:00.000+02:00Interesting stuff, but their table is very confusi...Interesting stuff, but their table is very confusing. Here are the rates of BOMs for Poland after correcting for varying sample sizes.<BR/><BR/>1. Denmark - 42.5% <BR/>2. Poland - 31.5%<BR/>3. Norway - 11.1%<BR/>4. North Germany (DE1) - 6.2%<BR/>5. Czech Rep. - 4.3%<BR/>6. South Germany (DE2) - 2.0%<BR/>7. Netherlands - 1.4%<BR/>8. United Kingdom 1%<BR/><BR/>Unless corrected, Poles end up having most BMOs in North Germany. And that's no wonder considerng the number of Germans tested.Polakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08791738703122670119noreply@blogger.com