tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post1206714680787927306..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: Kennewick Man was Native AmericanDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger54125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-9870285686288620672015-02-19T03:04:41.804+02:002015-02-19T03:04:41.804+02:00"you will want to remember my little bison le..."you will want to remember my little bison lesson". <br /><br />I still can't see what you were trying to say with your 'little bison lesson' unless it was to display your complete lack of anything to do with biology. terrythttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17327062321100035888noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-58502135290059193012015-02-19T01:29:47.736+02:002015-02-19T01:29:47.736+02:00Alashire,
What the heck are you getting on about?
...Alashire,<br />What the heck are you getting on about?<br />The last comment makes no sense at all.<br />ron quirorianohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13962646540029248884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-36033904083313011732015-02-16T20:08:15.334+02:002015-02-16T20:08:15.334+02:00The European knows what was recorded by eyewitne...The European knows what was recorded by eyewitnesses in just about 1/8 to 1/4 of the world . basically that record is just from the Mediterranean and you can't explain that either. and you only have that record only because they Israelites actually lived through those events when few else did live through it! <br /><br /> so now those claiming to be high minded <br />intellectuals ( not really anything more than just high being taught from those high ) are in rebellion to even that record . <br /> now what happened in the rest of the world has also been recorded by the few who lived through it and no the records are not exactly in the same form , but speak just loud ! Those records scream from all over the place. Now the rest of the 3/4+ of the world recorded and passed down what it experienced. and it screams from every form of record man can make and that record of man he can imaginable. <br /><br /> but you your high minded priest and shaman of pretend knowledge will never know what that is and never know the laws of those things . but it is your lose because this is about your guys choice of ignor-ance. but the truth screams from everywhere to anyone listening. <br /><br /> what happened on the back side of Earth and to the rest of the world is remembered and you won't take it or steal it or bury it ever again! and no amount of mocking is going to make anyone forget it.. no matter how many back hoes and shovels you guys try and use to cover it up alter or change it with your big a22 sticks and brain washing.. . the most real proof of true history glares down at us every single night. <br /><br /> Someday what you all call science might figure out how dna really works in real life and not in a microscope. right now you guys are trying to tell people their history from less than 3% of the truth and that only the coded stuff and then if they do figure it out m you will want to remember my little bison lesson.Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-19854530636708637132015-02-13T10:10:16.721+02:002015-02-13T10:10:16.721+02:00"they don't know what the worlds history ..."they don't know what the worlds history was and they are nutters for the goofy stories they have come up with". <br /><br />You seem to have a very strange and idiosyncratic view of history. terrythttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17327062321100035888noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-40461549669970342122015-02-08T22:51:13.230+02:002015-02-08T22:51:13.230+02:00From what I can see at the moment first entry and ...From what I can see at the moment first entry and settlement of the Americas was from the West (Ainu-like folk (more robust skulls), then more gracile folk following from the WEST. Then possible/probable minor later flows from the East. Inuit-like types from the West after that. That is my best guestimate with what we have now.<br /><br />(slight correction of typo and clarification)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11000684388615334278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-43683324349204291712015-02-07T08:46:02.109+02:002015-02-07T08:46:02.109+02:00http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/genomics/non-h...http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/genomics/non-human/elephant-paleogenomics-forest-rohland-2010.html<br /><br /> for those of you who's heads spin and you stop thinking or reading..when you see scary words..<br /><br /><br />" Woolly mammoths were Holarctic animals, with a range that extended from Europe to North America, while Columbian mammoths were limited to the Americas south of the U.S.-Canada border, roughly." <br /><br /> Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-35452931068684142772015-02-07T04:13:57.821+02:002015-02-07T04:13:57.821+02:00http://www.irishcentral.com/news/archaeological-ev...http://www.irishcentral.com/news/archaeological-evidence-links-polar-bears-to-irish-brown-bears-125180369-237397981.html<br /><br /> they are not Siberian bears but Irish bears!Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-51469763164303630022015-02-07T03:34:39.981+02:002015-02-07T03:34:39.981+02:00@Alashire:
maybe some people went that way to trad...@Alashire:<br /><i>maybe some people went that way to trade... but only when Alaska was down around Hawaii </i><br /><br />When Alaska was "down around" Hawaii there were no people around to trade - not by a few hundred millions years.<br /><br /><i>http://grisda.org/origins/01101.pdf... they won't find any buried dna after that event! 3200 years ago</i><br /><br />This paper claims that the Ginko Petrified Forest is "strongly suggestive of catastrophic<br />conditions as described in the book of Genesis in the Bible" - and hence I presume that the 3,200ya event that you think wiped out all ancient DNA is the Great Flood of Noah's Ark fame. This is scientific blog, how about you go troll your religious beliefs somewhere else.Tobushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05529220083970625733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-55448969158057341852015-02-06T02:54:31.027+02:002015-02-06T02:54:31.027+02:00beringa is such a joke..
well maybe some peopl...<br /> beringa is such a joke..<br /> well maybe some people went that way to trade.. but only when Alaska was down around Hawaii !~<br /><br /> <br /> http://grisda.org/origins/01101.pdf<br /><br /><br /><br /> they won't find any buried dna after that event! 3200 years ago... as memorialized by the Surpent mound..<br /> if they say they found dna from before that ...they are probably lying!!! or profoundly and terminally ignorant. <br /> maybe when Alaska was where Hawaii is now.. maybe then it was a highway for all kinds of animals and trees and dna.. but that trading holds true for both sides of the EYE. but it is not where anyone came from , certainly not there!! .<br /> certainly no one came from up there ever as their origins. <br /><br /> except the last 500 years maybe ! yes bunches of Russians and Eskimos came for the fur trade in Canada in the 500 years and thousands of other kinds of slaves from Polynesians to SE-Asians of every kind. .. and there aint no one looking for their dna. the cult scientism has been using that dna to prove how gooofy they really are. <br /> <br /><br /> when Alaska and Russia was a Hawaiian tropical forrest maybe it was a freeway then , maybe !! but china has been visiting a long time since the event. and they weren't ever from here either.. <br /> <br /><br /> hey Ps haplogroup B probably came from U5 and U6. please remember they don't know why dna mutates.. events causing life altering stress and or changes in foods might have something to do with it. <br /> <br />Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-2111994860451440882015-02-05T20:51:01.205+02:002015-02-05T20:51:01.205+02:00"We know game crossed. People would have foll..."We know game crossed. People would have followed the game"<br /><br />no proof of any games crossing from Europe to northamerica, and no proof of any people traveling the atlantic on greenland or the ice sheets. sorry without anything to go by, it just becomes wishful thinking.<br /><br />"From what I can see at the moment first entry and settlement of the Americas was from the West (Ainu-like folk, then more gracile folk following from the East. Then possible/probable minor later flows from the East. Inuit-like types from the West after that. That is my best guestimate with what we have now"<br /><br />There is three major migrations from Archaeology and Genetics. that is first earliest Paleo-amerindins, then followed by 2nd wave of later amerindins and finally more recent 3rd population that came to alaska and canadian arctic. all 3 entry and settlement of the Americas was from the West(siberia), so there was no Ainu-like gracile folk following from Europe in the East. There is no proof with what we have now about any european migrations. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12020626181235731176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-80589543587654378722015-02-05T20:06:39.200+02:002015-02-05T20:06:39.200+02:00http://elementsunearthed.com/2010/10/06/thorium/
...http://elementsunearthed.com/2010/10/06/thorium/<br /> here is the reason for their wishful thinking and fake dates.<br /> That Scientism don't know the laws of dating the moons thorium that has been deposited just 3200 years ago. and They will never know the laws of it or those events . <br /><br /> these two sites have the info about some <br /> rare earth minerals pictures better . you can check out all other rare earth minerals and get to the truth . <br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occurrence_of_thorium<br /><br />http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Moon_Mining.html<br /><br /> and statements on these can beyond stupid.. like like the close side has more mineral.. when in fact it is only more revealed by a collision with earth . so pay attention to the maps.. <br /> be sure to look at the thorium shots at a google search too, of both earth and the moon. do they understand the laws of those bodies which died in the moons thorium dust and what that would do to radio active elements in any human body dead or those alive that died in that moment? . they don't know the laws of such events. they will never know the laws of such events. no matter how big their sticks get don't believe them.. does anyone know how those events changed mtdna or any dna? NO!!!! <br /> native people do check out subjects like 'Carolina Bays" and " all those " 50000 year old"( NOT ! ) (good wood) not even rotten trees buried under the piedmont and in the gulf. and the layer of dirt that matches only the moon that is 6 ft under 6ft deep across all of North America. with 6ft of <br /> "sterile sands" over that !!! <br /> they don't know what the worlds history was and they are nutters for the goofy stories they have come up with.. and if you believe they got a clue then your a "true believer" in that kind of shamanism/naturalism goofiness too. because they don't have a clue what they are talking about. but they sure got their kind magic going on. Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-12944851103855722152015-02-05T16:24:01.349+02:002015-02-05T16:24:01.349+02:00"Currently, there are more than “200” ANCIENT..."Currently, there are more than “200” ANCIENT confirmed Native American DNA samples from across NORTH AMERICA. If they wanted to determine the origins of the Amerindians, they have more than enough DNA. There is no interest in the origins of Amerindians. They came from Asia - case closed" case has never been opened yet! not seriously. there is a reason that all bones from the north east aren't older than 3200 years. even by their dating methods.<br /> in the mean time bones from places like China lake are not 5000 years old.. That one is less than 500 because this is where the Chinese went to mine after they stopped building railroads. They called it China lake for a reason folks and it is NOT 5000 years old period. If that starts the scale then all your 5000 are 500 and your 10000 are 1000 years. because max is probably 3200 years folks. <br /> that timing the cult shaman uses is just more cult practices and <br />" indisputable proof" that is just more of the same kind of fabrications every other cult in the world uses and will use . <br /> if they claim it is over 3200 years old it is probably tea leaves they are reading. <br />Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-49574111804104383022015-02-05T05:25:38.018+02:002015-02-05T05:25:38.018+02:00Haplogroup M found by in a sample by a scientist w...Haplogroup M found by in a sample by a scientist with a Punjabi surname. <br /><br />Hmm. Not sure I believe that one.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11000684388615334278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-79108030113697613032015-02-05T05:01:09.457+02:002015-02-05T05:01:09.457+02:00Well I dont know who "they" are. I am j...Well I dont know who "they" are. I am just as interested in South American DNA (or Japanese DNA for that matter). I am MORE interested in Caribbean DNA and there is no great white conspiracy there.<br /><br />There are't enough ancient DNA samples in Europe or Asia to answer all the questions there, and there certainly arent enough in America. A mtDNA result is a very small part of the story.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11000684388615334278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-64315722800196106342015-02-04T14:50:58.964+02:002015-02-04T14:50:58.964+02:00FYI
A short list of ANCIENT Native American DNA sa...FYI<br />A short list of ANCIENT Native American DNA samples.<br />12,710 - Arlington Springs Woman - B <br />12,600 - Anzik-1 - D4h3a, Q-L54*(xM3)<br />12,000 - Hoyo Negro Girl - D1 <br />10,300 - On Your Knees Cave - D4h3a, Q1a3a1a<br />10,250 - Wizard’s Beach - C1d <br />8,000 - Hourglass Cave - B2 <br />7,400 – Windower - X2a <br />5,500 - Lucy Islands (938) - A2ag <br />5,000 - Lucy Islands (939) - D4h3a <br />5,000 -Dodge Island (160a) - A2ah <br />4,975 - Big Bar Lake - A2 <br />4,959 - China Lake - M <br />2,500 - Dodge Island (152) - A2ag<br /><br />The samples are from: Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Montana, Nevada - British Columbia & Mexico<br /><br />DNA SAMPLES LESS THAN 3,000 YEARS <br /><br />34 – Hopewell Mound - (Ohio)<br />39 - Klunk mound - (Illinois) <br />108 - Norris Farm Oneota – (Ohio)<br />9 - Morse (Red Ocher tradition, 2,700 BP) <br />11 - the Orendorf - (Mississippian tradition, 800 BP) – Illinois<br />2 – Beothuk tribe (extinct) – Newfoundland<br />1 - long-ago person - British Columbia<br />44 - Great Western Park (Western Basin tradition, 800 BP), Glacial Kame (2,900 BP) Ontario, Morse (Red Ocher tradition, 2,700 BP), Orendorf <br />39 - Schild site – (Illinois) – Nov. 2014<br /><br />As I said there are more than 25,000 skeletal remains in museums.<br /><br />All the fuss made over remains is because the remains are always promoted as not being Native American (eg. Luzia, Spirit Cave Man, Windover bog people, Kennewick Man, on and on).<br /><br />If they ever find one that’s not Native American, all other evidence will be discarded. That’s a proven fact.<br />Niinetahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16915175155778576367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-51297082439827736392015-02-04T14:31:45.548+02:002015-02-04T14:31:45.548+02:00The term Caucasian was racist from its inception. ...The term Caucasian was racist from its inception. A brief review of the term’s history will clarify that. A history most people are aware of, and for some the reason it’s considered racist and outdated. There is nothing ludicrous about that opinion.<br /><br />Claiming “No tribes in the Americas trace back even 2k years in a particular location” is “false” and claiming I made any reference to 12k is just as “false”.<br /><br />Currently, there are more than “200” ANCIENT confirmed Native American DNA samples from across NORTH AMERICA. If they wanted to determine the origins of the Amerindians, they have more than enough DNA. There is no interest in the origins of Amerindians. They came from Asia - case closed<br /><br />The priority is to prove the Amerindians were NOT the first inhabitants of the Americas. Hence their obsession with the Solutrean Theory and insistence Kennewick man was not Native American.<br /><br />So far it’s been reported, Amerindians descend from East Asians, Austronesians and Siberians. There is no need for a Proto-European migration, since the Amerindians are now purported to be significantly west Eurasian.<br /><br />“What annoys me is people who make up some story that "has to" be true.”<br /><br />Yeah that annoys me too.<br />Niinetahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16915175155778576367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-69025303168376148012015-02-04T00:31:03.987+02:002015-02-04T00:31:03.987+02:00Personally I think folk would have been moving bac...Personally I think folk would have been moving back and forth across the top of the North Atlantic between the Americas and Northern Europe whenever the climate allowed. So far as I know there was no big apartheid sign saying "No Europeans Allowed" at the border with Greenland. That is a construction of a modern racist ideology. We know game crossed. People would have followed the game. How many, and did they leave any descendants is the question. <br /><br />From what I can see at the moment first entry and settlement of the Americas was from the West (Ainu-like folk, then more gracile folk following from the East. Then possible/probable minor later flows from the East. Inuit-like types from the West after that. That is my best guestimate with what we have now.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11000684388615334278noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-90936782219639328052015-02-03T22:15:14.183+02:002015-02-03T22:15:14.183+02:00http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoa.12...http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoa.12033/abstract<br /> read it and weep <br /> Turtle island was a very real event memorialized on both the Pict's Rhyniestones and by the Serpent mound. and it wasn't no dang 12000 years ago no matter what those with the big stick try and tell you! <br /> It was the bronze age collapse. about 3200 or maybe 2800 years ago. the genetics of turtle island doesn't and never did have to match the rest of the islands or of those who survived .. which are now two continents called North and South America not hundreds of Islands in the general shape of an EYEball. they were at most only cousins rooted in the same traditions and ancestral cultures . But where that went to from that event and all the deaths and the death of the great kings by Menes before that event and others who came or took over after that event ... well can be and did becomes just anything. and we do not have to match with their dna. scientism is cult with a big stick backed by a government with a bigger stick. and no one should give it any more credence than any other cult men can dream up . it is not science. Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-59601128973779858342015-02-03T15:40:07.252+02:002015-02-03T15:40:07.252+02:00well you all got people going here or from there o... well you all got people going here or from there or whatever.... whatever..<br /><br /> well again I will leave you all with a concept, there is a reason native americans call parts of north america turtle island.... rotf! and if you think you got that figured out ,well you don't !Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-85165439936132928592015-02-03T02:05:35.182+02:002015-02-03T02:05:35.182+02:00Also it should be noted that DNA test for populati...Also it should be noted that DNA test for population analysis means a lot less than most people think. Plenty of people in europe get 'native american' mixture especially Irish and basque.<br /><br />This DNA obviously doesn't come from north america originally. No one ever claimed that modern europeans crossed to north america. Proto-europeans who also had the same 'ainur-like' look may have. These could have been related to the ainur in NE asia or they may have crossed the atlantic. At the time of beringia it was possible to walk across the atlantic on ice sheets as well. Water levels were much lower.<br /><br />Fiend of 9 worldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17712083368615685458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-43193954312356440542015-02-03T01:58:35.794+02:002015-02-03T01:58:35.794+02:00Laughing just shows yourself to be a fool. I reall...Laughing just shows yourself to be a fool. I really don't care about the opinion of people who only chime in on their one pet issue. That's a lot of people who comment here.<br /><br />I never made any claim of any kind about kinnewick man, that is wholly made up in your head. What annoys me is people who make up some story that "has to" be true and then they won't even allow anyone else to test the hypothesis. Look above for the post I was talking about. Caucasoid and Caucasion are NOT outdated, racist terms. That's ludicrous.<br /><br />Mostly they don't even have some basic knowledge on the subjects they speak on. For example claiming continuity going back 12k years or more. Sorry, NO. That is a fantasy. <br /><br />Now as to whether or not the people in those areas are the same now as they were back then, or when people first came to the area and from where, those are not things we just assume. We test them, such as with carbon dating and DNA sequencing.<br /><br />Trying to get in the way of that doesn't help anybody. If your case is right it will be born out by DNA tests eventually even if there is some evil white man fraud perpetrated (which I still look for some examples of). Standing in the way of it that like some people do doesn't help their case any.<br /><br />Fiend of 9 worldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17712083368615685458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-46132028852047539622015-02-02T18:18:16.366+02:002015-02-02T18:18:16.366+02:00Grognard . . What’s at stake? Do you mean Kennewi...Grognard . . What’s at stake? Do you mean Kennewick man may still be Caucasian? He’s NOT; and they knew that from the beginning.<br /><br />Back in 2000 Chatters said he knew Kennewick man wasn’t Caucasian. During an interview, he said, “If I didn’t say Kennewick man was Caucasian the Indians would have him”.<br /><br />No doubt a statement to cover his rear-end since the DNA test had indicated Kennewick man was haplotype “D”. Information discarded and reported as the 2 other labs couldn’t replicate the results.<br /><br />There are more than 25,000 skeletal remains and bone fragment in museums across the Americas and those which have been tested have shown continuity in the populations ranging from 2 to 6,000 years. <br /><br />Numerous DNA studied on the northwest coast has shown continuity of 5000 years for the populations there. So your statement “No tribes in the Americas trace back even 2k years in a particular location” is false. <br /><br />“Obviously many people are not interested in the truth but in proving a point so they can press home their agenda”. All this lying and fabrication of information certainly proves your point. Lying and stealing is the hallmark of those people.<br /><br />So after 15 years what did they learn? That Kennewick man wasn’t Caucasian? They knew that from the beginning. <br /><br />The Kennewick man results make no difference now; since the NEW fabrication is Amerindians are actually 1/3 west Eurasian (Caucasian ??????????????? )))<br /><br />Whoops. . . I fell of my chair laughing. <br />Niinetahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16915175155778576367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-45596911936719374842015-02-01T12:17:54.015+02:002015-02-01T12:17:54.015+02:00Outdated = doesn't go with your political bias...Outdated = doesn't go with your political bias. Always people who have some agenda spew this nonsense, and they are never seen on these subjects when nothing political is at stake.<br /><br />I am glad to know of the results, the previous clovis result was ambiguous to me because it was on the very edge of clovis territory.<br /><br />As for "stealing" bones this is ridiculous and annoying. No tribes in the americas trace back even 2k years in a particular location let alone 12k+ years. It is criminal to allow this nonsense to get in the way of science and anthropology. Again, more politics tying people's hands. Obviously many people are not interested in the truth but in proving a point so they can press home their agenda.<br /><br />Fiend of 9 worldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17712083368615685458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-83819843093512733092015-01-29T02:39:39.594+02:002015-01-29T02:39:39.594+02:00this discussion is so ignorant that will be my la... this discussion is so ignorant that will be my last post .I was the one about 8 years ago that line out why Kennewick man was Native American and related to the choctaw and chickasaw who came to the SE from that area. .<br /><br /> it was a nut job scientist who tried to tell us KM was "white " so they could steal his bones and over ride native tribes.. which by the way haplogroup Q can be " white " just like Larry David and it can be "black" and it can be "native" and it can be "asian<br /> looking and that it could and did happen here just like in Israel.. and we could easy have white indians.. and even black indians... but looks don't have sh*t to do with anything! . except that is how scientist do their kind of 'science' and do it to prove what they want it to be.<br /> You all been smoking way to much something and all your goofy theories only sound good if you are high being taught by a professor who is also high..<br /> I been saying for 8years he was native and that you don't have a clue about how dna works or history of North America and you guys are all stupid as a stump! just keep talking and you just keep proving that to be true! you will believe what you want to believe.. but you believe in lies! <br /> i'm done!Alashirehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13726181228173268004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-64688010791021460912015-01-29T02:00:33.055+02:002015-01-29T02:00:33.055+02:00"I challenge you to cite your 25% Amerind in ..."I challenge you to cite your 25% Amerind in Europeans with an actual reference. This has not been my observation. "<br /><br />I said/meant 25% with a ghosted around 4 % because the morons haven't got a clue what they are even looking at so they don';t even know what the 4 % is. they don't know how dna even works yet."<br /><br />So no reference. Thats what I figured. That is because it is not true.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11000684388615334278noreply@blogger.com