tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post89914191685783326..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: New isolates from Friuli-Venezia Giulia regionDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-2557471372079154912012-12-28T21:00:30.427+02:002012-12-28T21:00:30.427+02:00Are the samples available ? Are the samples available ? truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08622344688109770244noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-54748296615063209402012-12-21T10:38:10.103+02:002012-12-21T10:38:10.103+02:00It would be more interesting to see structures INS...It would be more interesting to see structures INSIDE national populations rather than comparing North Italian isolates with Rssians and Estonians as a whole. Doing like they do there is grawbacks, like <br /><br />- we dont know how the national average is completed (see below)<br /><br />- we find out nothing about the population structure inside each national populations<br /><br />Collecting data from isolated villages from each country we could estimate the diversity composition of each country. It could be real widepread diversity or could mirror several distinct ethnic groups. I would make a bet that for example in Estonian the diversity is a result of Estonian and Russian subpopulations, speaking Estonian and Russian languages. Looking local (villages) results this could be seen. <br /><br />By comparing internally national results of LD and homozygosity we could estimate a) is the overall diversity real b) the ratio between samples collected for the group G (general subpopulations) and isolations.<br /><br />Making those comparisons it would be later possible to built a historical view from national structures and even judge present studies and result to new studies in future and see the national sampling quality. <br /><br />Maurihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03670078523265515878noreply@blogger.com