tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post7632074980202083644..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: Lack of sexual dimorphism in facial proportions in White European facesDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-82822730168571638862012-08-10T20:00:25.717+03:002012-08-10T20:00:25.717+03:00I don't have the background to make much sense...I don't have the background to make much sense of the paper, so correct me if I get this wrong, but the first photograph shows them measuring across the guy's cheekbones, (Is that the standard method?) when what is sexually dimorphically male about his face is his big wide chin. He would never be a very convincing drag queen.<br /><br />Another feature that is characteristally male in Western Europeans is a square chin, although not only Europeans - I once saw a Hakka guy with the same feature. It made him look very norhhtern. I have seen this feature on some women, but attenuated, and as I saw on some non-Europeans. Does this method of skull measurement take that into account?Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07187836541591828806noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-35887681340758021772012-08-10T17:59:55.269+03:002012-08-10T17:59:55.269+03:00I thought that's how it should be, given that ...I thought that's how it should be, given that one ratio might be considered most beautiful.princenuadhahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02165977957244158593noreply@blogger.com