tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post7157997069290574756..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: The winding road to agricultureDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-78788655769256907622012-10-17T13:01:39.508+03:002012-10-17T13:01:39.508+03:00Anyone want to comment on the ~1,500 BCE time fram...Anyone want to comment on the ~1,500 BCE time frame? That's clearly IE in northern Europe, but definitely not yet Celtic as we know it. <br /><br />If I had enough money to bet losing my shirt more than once, I would suggest that an early form of "Celtic" made it NW at this time. Why? Island Celtic is so different that I can't fathom it being a very late derivative of what was spoken at Hallstatt nor what was Celt-Iberian nor what was early Ligurian-like.eurologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03440019181278830033noreply@blogger.com