tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post5595267462718519554..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: Chronology of Ksar AkilDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-69725152117220619622013-09-17T06:10:23.337+03:002013-09-17T06:10:23.337+03:00what about 42,000 year old flue and half man half ...what about 42,000 year old flue and half man half lion statue in south Germany.<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_man_of_the_Hohlenstein_Stadel<br />http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/42-000-old-mammoth-ivory-bird-bone-flutes-022437960.html<br /><br />Also what about 41,500-44,00 year old human jaw in Wales so they probably arrived in Europe much earlier. Humans specifically Caucasians from the mid east arrived in Europe over 50,000 years ago i get sick of the conservative. dates. They didn't just spawn from Mid east to wales it took thousands of years of undirect migrations.<br /><br />When u look at globe13 aust dna the only group to orignate in Europe and is dominet in 7,000ybp Mesloithic European sample is called North Euro. It's ancestral form defintley arrived in PAleoithic europe. Also it is the only trace we have of Paleoithic Europeans. The guy who was dominted by it in Spain had mtDNa U5b2c1 U5 the oldest mtDNA haplogroup in Europe deifntley has been here for over 40,000 years. Also U5b2 is popular in Paleoithic samples and mtDNA U was dominte in PAleoithic and Mesloithic samples.<br /><br />The mtDNA U dominted hunter gathers of Europe who are suppose to have arrived over 40,000ybp maybe th earliest probably are the source of north Eurp in globe13. So what this tells us is very early settlers in Europe probably arroved over 30,000ybp are the main ancestors of modern Europeans. and their brother group is called west asian which can give an idea of were in the mid east they orignated. West asian is over 50% in the Caucus, and around 40-45% from Antolia, north and central Iraq-Pakistan. It decreases as u go south intp Syria then really goes down as i get into Arabia and north Africa. <br /><br />The source of that Paleoithic European group the one that has the only sruviving blooodline and is dominte in Modern Europeans. Most likley came from Caucus, Antolia, Iraq-Iran really the north west border of Europe and mid east which makes total sense. But that is only when u look at the distrubtation of its brother west asian. It would not have been one family that migrated to Europe but a mix of a much of related families which cold explain multiple mtDNA haplogroups. Krefterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01055804913528477710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-83567061359991498032013-09-16T06:11:27.057+03:002013-09-16T06:11:27.057+03:00"of an age comparable to that of the oldest d..."of an age comparable to that of the oldest directly-dated European AMH" via "radiocarbon date".<br /><br />Not OOA but colonization of Europe, or did I read it wrong?Wilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03139893226825865757noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-28460072044357656962013-09-16T06:09:38.754+03:002013-09-16T06:09:38.754+03:00Directly dated human remains.
"of an age co...Directly dated human remains. <br /><br />"of an age comparable to that of the oldest directly-dated European AMH"Wilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03139893226825865757noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-87823849579112027662013-09-15T04:13:45.162+03:002013-09-15T04:13:45.162+03:00Well I don't find the closeness in the dates s...Well I don't find the closeness in the dates so strange. From 1492 to 1992 the New Word went from no Western Europeans to half a billion of them spread over two continents. When conditions are right it just does not take modern humans long to get around. And the first half of that period was pretty much without mechanized transportation.<br />Mark Moore (Moderator)https://www.blogger.com/profile/17386056132530808723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-25164829547961470632013-09-14T07:46:21.479+03:002013-09-14T07:46:21.479+03:00Why does the author link dates of ~40 kya to ooA? ...Why does the author link dates of ~40 kya to ooA? These are roughly the same dates as for Europe, incl. Russia, and should be most easily related to the near-simultaneous expansions in and from Asia.<br /><br />IIRC, the Levant finds are slightly earlier, ~50 kya.eurologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03440019181278830033noreply@blogger.com