tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post5480592535600310069..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: More ADMIXTURE estimates in EurasiaDienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-35746040989662846182014-11-28T08:13:46.461+02:002014-11-28T08:13:46.461+02:00I don't understand why does in K=2, all Buryat...I don't understand why does in K=2, all Buryat samples show some Caucasian admixture while in K=3, very little Buryat samples show European admixture?<br /><br />Does it mean there are certain Buryats who are 100% pure Mongoloids? Why does K=2 and K=3 Buryat samples contradict each other?<br /><br />Ramberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18057789585601848229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-84337808913182598152010-10-01T21:11:13.618+03:002010-10-01T21:11:13.618+03:00True, but were there ever Tatars or Mongols in the...True, but were there ever Tatars or Mongols in the territory of Slovenia? Maybe some Tatar soldiers fighting for the Ottomans passed through Slovenia but that's all. Ottomans themselves ruled only a very small part of Slovenia and only for about 150 years. I think my Uralic hypothesis is much more plausible than any Mongol or Tatar hypothesis. <br /><br /><b>Typo correction for</b> "Uralics Mongols" <b>in my first post:</b> Uralics <b>and</b> MongolsOnur Dincerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05041378853428912894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-32483002913887315752010-10-01T18:47:09.496+03:002010-10-01T18:47:09.496+03:00Notice too, how the lone Slovenian becomes "b...<i>Notice too, how the lone Slovenian becomes "blue" indicating Mongol rather than Chinese origins.</i><br /><br />Poland still has a small historic Muslim Tartar community.<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_PolandKatharóshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16649693310029639154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-21307660530392464302010-09-30T22:41:41.337+03:002010-09-30T22:41:41.337+03:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Onur Dincerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05041378853428912894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-60988284062779127972010-09-30T22:39:03.990+03:002010-09-30T22:39:03.990+03:00Notice too, how the lone Slovenian becomes "b...<i>Notice too, how the lone Slovenian becomes "blue" indicating Mongol rather than Chinese origins.</i><br /><br />More likely Uralic origins, judging by the northern Mongoloid affiliations of both Uralics Mongols.<br /><br /><i>but may represent a more recent (e.g., Slavic) European element</i><br /><br />No need to go that far as Kyrgyzstanis have much more of the green component than Buryats. Certainly very little, if any, of the green component in Kyrgyzstanis is from recent admixture with Russians or any other Slavs.Onur Dincerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05041378853428912894noreply@blogger.com