tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post1160461744659682652..comments2024-01-04T04:11:55.717+02:00Comments on Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: House of Bourbon belonged to Y-haplogroup R1b1b2a1a1b* (R-Z381*)Dienekeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02082684850093948970noreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-14035234917394450132015-03-02T00:43:01.950+02:002015-03-02T00:43:01.950+02:00Here is a link to my R-Z381 FTDNA37 test results. ...Here is a link to my R-Z381 FTDNA37 test results. Far as I can tell with my limited research I am related closely to no one in any database i have looked at.<br />http://dannypetro.blogspot.com/2015/02/r-z381.htmlAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504599568634877994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-52352848189804087822015-03-01T23:58:33.676+02:002015-03-01T23:58:33.676+02:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504599568634877994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-12586472735073574232015-03-01T04:33:58.585+02:002015-03-01T04:33:58.585+02:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504599568634877994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-32703207237622068232014-10-27T10:27:53.634+02:002014-10-27T10:27:53.634+02:00 I received my results from the National Geographi... I received my results from the National Geographic Geno 2.0 program. Genetics has always fascinated me, among other things.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504599568634877994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-23582051141858327252014-10-27T10:00:24.349+02:002014-10-27T10:00:24.349+02:00 I do not see how that DNA can be all that rare si... I do not see how that DNA can be all that rare since my male side is r-z381 and my female side is U5a1b, surely there are more people living with this ancestry, they have merely not been tested yet. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07504599568634877994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-35855262827591661912014-09-10T07:17:45.336+03:002014-09-10T07:17:45.336+03:00I would like to see the results of a test on Louis...I would like to see the results of a test on Louis XIX. As I am apparently R-Z381 Y- DNA (FTDNA).<br />- teltalheartteltalhearthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09614483389675262418noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-85394338979155806642014-06-14T09:38:24.973+03:002014-06-14T09:38:24.973+03:00Why not test Charles X or Louis Xviiii?Why not test Charles X or Louis Xviiii?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04163967849909870520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-47117831950428885512014-06-14T09:37:17.587+03:002014-06-14T09:37:17.587+03:00The simplest method to solve this problem would be...The simplest method to solve this problem would be to test the remains of Charles X and Louis XiX. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04163967849909870520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-61399320427103420972014-03-20T21:54:51.661+02:002014-03-20T21:54:51.661+02:00I match about 20 strsI match about 20 strsBjorn Witloxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04623921502432144434noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-64197838899828483592014-01-23T12:52:24.971+02:002014-01-23T12:52:24.971+02:00If I remember correctly the descendants that were ...If I remember correctly the descendants that were tested actually all descend from Louis XIII. That means that any type of adultery in the line would have had to be committed by Marie de Medici. All of the descendants of Louis XIII test in R1b1 so that is his DNA. I remember reading that the mitochondrial DNA from the skull was less certain so it probably should not have been published as it could have been from someone who handled the skull at some point in time. They apparently got multiple lines. The Y chromosome was in haplogroup G as was the handkerchief. I do think the DNA of the Bourbon Kings is R1b1 and that some sort relic scam was committed. Maybe even by the same family. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07064050732601851193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-17310031175095049122013-11-01T03:18:19.045+02:002013-11-01T03:18:19.045+02:00Artificial insemination was indeed practiced in th...Artificial insemination was indeed practiced in the past. They called it immaculate conception meaning conception without the act. The essence of a man would be collected in a piece of linen and inserted into the proper place in the woman and pregnancy often followed. The problem is, who were the donors. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-74088183244083137572013-10-27T08:08:54.198+02:002013-10-27T08:08:54.198+02:00Fascinating and amazing that 2 individuals from 20...Fascinating and amazing that 2 individuals from 200 years apart get souvenired by the collectors and these individuals come from such a rare dna line G2a3* even with a healed facial wound which Henry would have received in 1594.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-4475476110279761222013-10-22T20:13:52.281+03:002013-10-22T20:13:52.281+03:00How is R1b1a2 related to that? Because, I'm r...How is R1b1a2 related to that? Because, I'm reasonably sure that it is related somehow (cousins, maybe).shenandoahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09220865518565583662noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-24439196799017892132013-10-14T09:43:46.259+03:002013-10-14T09:43:46.259+03:00Or a smaller family lineage was assimilated into a...Or a smaller family lineage was assimilated into a larger family at one point in time. The claim that they had some sort of mystical ancestor “female or male” would have probably been enough for such an event, especially if there was something to gain for both sides.<br /><br />Or as already said, the head may have bin swapped for some reason.<br /><a href="http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/The-Gruesome-History-of-Eating-Corpses-as-Medicine.html" rel="nofollow">The Gruesome History of Eating Corpses as Medicine</a>Katharóshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16649693310029639154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-40130864405186395502013-10-14T08:09:44.286+03:002013-10-14T08:09:44.286+03:00You should check this, its not his head:
http://w...You should check this, its not his head:<br /><br />http://www.livescience.com/40367-french-king-dna-mystery.html<br /><br />http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/10/13/3279494/dna-study-mummified-head-didnt.htmlCrimson Guardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11622608998338145821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-5471377135191796392013-10-14T02:57:36.067+03:002013-10-14T02:57:36.067+03:00I think the claims that Philippe of Orleans would ...I think the claims that Philippe of Orleans would not have fathered the children from his marriages because he was "homosexual" is anachronistic. Based on evidence, his sexual preference seems indeed to have been on his own gender, but the idea of homosexual male who has sex only with males is very modern; Philippe's marriages were marriages of political convenience. Neither lust nor romance played a role in them. Basically, most "homosexual" men in previous historical eras were "bisexual", if only to fulfill the expected family and social roles; most of them would have been unlikely even to contemplate anything else. For Philippe not to have had sex with his wifes could have also caused an international political scandal. Raimo Kangasniemihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07317328563337885584noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-27571810891523307812013-10-13T22:01:44.766+03:002013-10-13T22:01:44.766+03:00"Moreover, matrilineal genealogical data reve..."Moreover, matrilineal genealogical data revealed that the published mtDNA sequence of the head was also different from the one of a series of relatives."<br /><br />We shouldn't assume the head and the blood on the hanky are from Louis XVI. For all anyone knows it might have been switched with that of another victim. Who wouldn't want the head of European royalty? It's the ultimate collectible.ManGodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18165484109797836864noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-16061702842717686502013-10-13T10:42:14.018+03:002013-10-13T10:42:14.018+03:00Since the head and hanky agree and both are as bon...Since the head and hanky agree and both are as bona fide as such artifacts can be, I find it hard to believe this result is correct unless there's something very wrong about the procedures used on ancient y-dna that gives bad results.<br /><br />Over enough time even babies accidentally switched at birth becomes an issue.Fiend of 9 worldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17712083368615685458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-26344180969424869882013-10-13T03:15:08.083+03:002013-10-13T03:15:08.083+03:00Unknown wrote,
"That won't work, Darrell...Unknown wrote,<br /><br />"That won't work, Darrell. Multiple lines of descent do not prove anything but that the lines are related. It certainly does not prove decent from a particular ancestor. It proves decent from SOME ancestor. The ancestor may or may not be who they claim him to be. Here we have some strong contrary evidence in the what would appear to be the actual DNA of the person in question. That is what we call direct evidence. And it normally still trumps the indirect evidence of people claiming descent -- especially because their claims are fundamentally hearsay and nothing they can have direct knowledge of."<br /><br />The forgery of "relics" is an ancient and widespread practice because there is always someone who a counterfeiter can dupe into paying great sums of money for one of his wares.<br /><br />How is the identification of that severed head and blood on a handkerchief as belonging to members of the House of Bourbon any less "hearsay" than the pedigrees of these living men?Ebizurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16925110639823856429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-48585885135816645862013-10-12T22:05:54.494+03:002013-10-12T22:05:54.494+03:00That won't work, Darrell. Multiple lines of d...That won't work, Darrell. Multiple lines of descent do not prove anything but that the lines are related. It certainly does not prove decent from a particular ancestor. It proves decent from SOME ancestor. The ancestor may or may not be who they claim him to be. Here we have some strong contrary evidence in the what would appear to be the actual DNA of the person in question. That is what we call direct evidence. And it normally still trumps the indirect evidence of people claiming descent -- especially because their claims are fundamentally hearsay and nothing they can have direct knowledge of.LivoniaGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05589404219598229067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-89000932416697500722013-10-11T15:28:58.966+03:002013-10-11T15:28:58.966+03:00The information/testing is validated by multiple l...The information/testing is validated by multiple lines of descent who match...thus the questionability is thrown out and not a possibility. Are you all newbies to genetic genealogy? GHOSTHUNTERhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05609693726323711437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-22630681530039722552013-10-10T20:31:06.086+03:002013-10-10T20:31:06.086+03:00Hold on! Proving DNA by someone's "desce...Hold on! Proving DNA by someone's "descendants" is a risky business. Particularly because these royals could not always be trusted about with whom they were mothering or fathering. This would not work in a paternity suit precisely because it assumes a fact in question.<br /><br />I'm sorry, but this piece of research is fundamentally questionable.LivoniaGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05589404219598229067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-41343401597029273562013-10-10T19:59:39.225+03:002013-10-10T19:59:39.225+03:00@mooreisbetter: If I am reading the chart correctl...@mooreisbetter: If I am reading the chart correctly, the objection due to Philippe I, Duke of Orleans' homosexuality is irrelevant because the Spanish descendent at far bottom right of the chart does not descend from Philip; his match with the other two is confirmation of their older genealogical relationship. The last common ancestor of the tested descendents, according to the chart, would be Louis XIII. It seems parsimonious to conclude then that either the head and handkerchief are invalid, or that there was a nonpaternity event for Louis XIII or his father.Greengerghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00412594752712535058noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-87245849838005503592013-10-09T23:16:31.397+03:002013-10-09T23:16:31.397+03:00It is almost certain the Bourbons actually fall so...It is almost certain the Bourbons actually fall somewhere under Z381.<br /><br />According to the the R1b-U106 Haplogroup project http://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106/default.aspx<br /><br />Everyone who is Z381 is also positive for one of its three known subclades: Z301, Z156, or (the much smaller) M323<br /><br />RayWing Genealogisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02927991809308313318noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7785493.post-41395033539744409212013-10-09T23:00:14.206+03:002013-10-09T23:00:14.206+03:00Apparently hardly anyone is Z381*, perhaps no-one....Apparently hardly anyone is Z381*, perhaps no-one. Could this be a group downstream of Z381. (This is part of U106).Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03954233919013760571noreply@blogger.com