This time, I removed SNPs with more than 1% genotyping no-call from the Xing et al. (2010) dataset, and ran ADMIXTURE on the following populations (left-to-right): Slovenian, Kyrgyzstani, Buryat, and HapMap Chinese. For K=2:
The results are as expected, with Slovenians and Chinese forming opposite poles, and Kyrgyzstanis and Buryat showing a preponderence of Mongoloid ancestry, but with variable Caucasoid admixture. Notice a single Slovenian showing eastern influence.
The Buryat get their own cluster (blue). Some Chinese are seen as having "Buryat" influence, which makes sense as there have been incursion of Mongols into China in historical times. Some Buryat too seem to be "Chinese"-influenced.
Kyrgyzstanis show mixed affiliations. The presence of both a Buryat and a "Chinese" cluster is interesting. The Kyrgyz live at a lower latitude than the Buryat, so this may be a reason behind the "Chinese" cluster, while the Buryat are a more purely northern Mongoloid population.
Notice too, how the lone Slovenian becomes "blue" indicating Mongol rather than Chinese origins. This also makes sense as the Chinese people did not migrate to Europe, while Mongoloids of the steppe and forest zones did.
Interesting is also the emergence of a 2-3 Buryat with some "European" admixture. These may not stem from the centuries old mix between Sakas and Mongols, but may represent a more recent (e.g., Slavic) European element.