May 27, 2008

First female DNA sequenced

Excerpt from ScienceDaily
ScienceDaily (May 26, 2008) — Geneticists of Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) are the first to determine the DNA sequence of a woman. She is also the first European whose DNA sequence has been determined. Following in-depth analysis, the sequence will be made public, except incidental privacy-sensitive findings. The results will contribute to insights into human genetic diversity.

DNA of geneticist Marjolein Kriek

The DNA is that of dr Marjolein Kriek, a clinical geneticist at LUMC. “If anyone could properly consider the ramifications of knowing his or her sequence, it is a clinical geneticist,” says professor Gert-Jan B van Ommen, leader of the LUMC team and director of the ‘Center for Medical Systems Biology’ (CMSB), a center of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative.

Van Ommen continues: “Moreover, while women don’t have a Y-chromosome, they have two X-chromosomes. As the X-chromosome is present as a single copy in half the population, the males, it has undergone a harsher selection in human evolution. This has made it less variable. We considered that sequencing only males, for ‘completeness’, slows insight into X-chromosome varialibity. So it was time, after sequencing four males, to balance the genders a bit”. He smiles: “And after Watson we also felt that it was okay to do Kriek”.

2 comments:

  1. "Van Ommen continues: “Moreover, while women don’t have a Y-chromosome, they have two X-chromosomes. [. . .] We considered that sequencing only males, for ‘completeness’, slows insight into X-chromosome varialibity. So it was time, after sequencing four males, to balance the genders a bit”."

    Their stated rationale doesn't make much sense to me. I'm thinking they did this more for publicity and/or PC.

    Sequence a man, and you get one complete haploid x-chromosome. Sequence a woman, and you get mixed-up data from two x-chromosomes--unless you have sufficient data and computational resources to untangle the actual haplotypes. This is certainly possible, but it's not free either.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Heheh Who said scientist don't have a sense of humour. I love the Watson/Kriek pun :)

    ReplyDelete

Stay on topic. Be polite. Use facts and arguments. Be Brief. Do not post back to back comments in the same thread, unless you absolutely have to. Don't quote excessively. Google before you ask.